Jacobian transformation and 2D curl

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the Jacobian transformation in the context of 2D curl calculations, specifically with the variable transformations u = x + y and v = y/x. The key point is the property of the Jacobian, which allows for the change of variables in integrals. The transformation can be expressed as J = \frac{\partial(x,y)}{\partial(u,v)} = \frac{1}{\frac{\partial(u,v)}{\partial(x,y)}}. The discussion clarifies that flipping the Jacobian does not cancel the dvdu term, thus maintaining the integrity of the integral.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Jacobian transformations in multivariable calculus
  • Familiarity with 2D curl operations in vector calculus
  • Knowledge of partial derivatives and their applications
  • Basic proficiency in integral calculus
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Jacobians in multivariable calculus
  • Learn about the application of curl in fluid dynamics
  • Explore inverse functions and their derivatives in calculus
  • Investigate the implications of variable transformations in double integrals
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physics students, and engineers who are working with multivariable calculus, particularly those focusing on vector fields and transformations in integrals.

Feodalherren
Messages
604
Reaction score
6
jacobian.png

Umm what just happened?
I understand as far as u=x+y and v = y/x and when he does the 2d curl. What I don't get is the step thereafter when he flips it. How does he know to flip it? Further, when he flips it wouldn't that make the dvdu inside the integral cancel and hence leave him with dxdy?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The Jacobian has the property
[itex]J=\frac{\partial(x,y)}{\partial(u,v)}=\frac{1}{\frac{\partial(u,v)}{ \partial (x,y)}}[/itex]
so the change of variables can be written as:
[itex]\int_{S}f(x,y)dxdy=\int_{S'}f(x(u,v),y(u,v))\left|\frac{\partial(x,y)}{ \partial(u,v)}\right|dudv=\int_{S'}f(x(u,v),y(u,v))\frac{1}{\left|\frac{\partial(u,v)}{ \partial (x,y)}\right|}dudv[/itex]

This is why you can first write [itex]u=u(x,y); v=v(x,y)[/itex] and then find the inverse of the corresponding Jacobian. Of course, you can easily verify that the result comes out the same if you use their inverses directly, that is, write [itex]x=x(u,v);y=y(u,v)[/itex] and find the corresponding Jacobian, it's just that in this particular example the first method works faster. As you can see, the [itex]dudv[/itex] part remains unaffected either way.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K