Jerk in Gravitation: Are Accelerations Equal in Cases of Varying Distances?

  • Thread starter Thread starter nDever
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravitation Jerk
AI Thread Summary
In the discussion, two masses, m1 and m2, are analyzed under gravitational influence at different distances, r = 20 and r = 10. The focus is on whether the jerk, defined as the rate of change of acceleration, is equal in both cases as the distances decrease. It is established that while both bodies experience increasing accelerations over time, the initial jerk is zero and increases linearly with time. The equations governing gravitational acceleration and jerk are provided, indicating that the motion can be approximated by uniform acceleration shortly after release. Overall, the jerk behavior in varying distances is explored, emphasizing the relationship between distance and gravitational effects.
nDever
Messages
76
Reaction score
1
Lets suppose that we setup two instances involving two masses m1 and m2.

m1 > m2

Case 1. The two bodies are separated by a distance r = 20.
Case 2. The two bodies are separated by a distance r = 10.

Suppose that in both setups, we were to release all restraining forces on these two bodies at once and let gravity have its way. Both the accelerations will increase over time because r is decreasing but is the jerk of both cases equal?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What "Jerk" are you referring to?
 
it's the rate of change of acceleration, or \frac{d^{3}\vec{r}}{dt^{3}}
 
Gravitational\,\,acceleration:\quad\vec{a}_1=\frac{Gm_2\vec{r}}{|\vec{r}|^3}\Rightarrow\dot{\vec{a}}_1=\frac{Gm_2\dot{\vec{r}}}{|\vec{r}|^3}-\frac{3Gm_2 (\dot{ \vec{ r}} \cdot \vec{r}) \vec{r}}{| \vec{r}|^5} where\,\,\dot{q}=\frac{\partial{}q}{\partial{}t} for\,\,any \,\,quantity\,\,qThis equation holds for all types of motion under only (two body) gravitational forces. Suppose the initial relative velocity of the two objects is zero, then near t=0 (when the two objects are released from rest) the motion is well approximated by uniform acceleration, for which the ratio v/r3 is approximately: |\frac{\dot{\vec{r}}}{|\vec{r}|^3}|\approx\frac{a_ot}{r_o^3}=\frac{Gm_2}{r_o^5}tSo, the jerk will initially be zero and increase approximately linearly with time (over distances that are small when compared to the initial separation).
 
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Dear all, in an encounter of an infamous claim by Gerlich and Tscheuschner that the Greenhouse effect is inconsistent with the 2nd law of thermodynamics I came to a simple thought experiment which I wanted to share with you to check my understanding and brush up my knowledge. The thought experiment I tried to calculate through is as follows. I have a sphere (1) with radius ##r##, acting like a black body at a temperature of exactly ##T_1 = 500 K##. With Stefan-Boltzmann you can calculate...
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (First part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8 and stuck at some statements. It's little bit confused. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. Solution : The surface bound charge on the ##xy## plane is of opposite sign to ##q##, so the force will be...
Back
Top