John Baez: Stringy Loopy Maths

  • Thread starter Thread starter wolram
  • Start date Start date
wolram
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
4,410
Reaction score
555
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/week184.html

John Baez

To really know a subject you've got to learn a bit of its history. If that subject is topology, you've got to read this:

1) I. M. James, editor, History of Topology, Elsevier, New York, 1999.

From a blow-by-blow account of the heroic papers of Poincare to a detailed account by Peter May of the prehistory of stable homotopy theory... it's all very fascinating. You'll probably want to study some more of the subject by the time you're done!

In order to satisfy that craving, I want to tell you how to compute some homology groups. But we'll do it a strange way: using "q-mathematics". I began talking about q-mathematics last week, but now I want to dig deeper.

At first, it looks like there are two really different places where this q-stuff shows up. One is when you do mathematics with q-deformed quantum groups replacing the Lie groups you know and love - this is important in string theory, knot theory, and loop quantum gravity. In this case it's best if q is a unit complex number, especially an nth root of unity:

q = exp(2 pi i / n)

You'll notice that in string theory, knot theory and loop quantum gravity, loops play a big role. This is no coincidence; in a way, quantum groups are just a technical device for studying "loop groups", which are groups consisting of functions from a circle to some specified Lie group.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


The other place where q shows up is in the theory of modular forms, which are functions on the upper half-plane that transform nicely under the modular group SL(2,Z). In this case it's best if q is a positive real number between 0 and 1, like 1/2 or 1/3.

At first, these two places where q shows up seem totally unrelated. But in fact, they're deeply connected! They're both parts of a bigger subject called "q-mathematics" - and this is what I want to explore today.

One of the amazing things about q-mathematics is that many seemingly unrelated mathematical structures can be reformulated in terms of q-deformed versions of themselves. For example, the q-deformed version of a Lie group is a quantum group, and the q-deformed version of a group ring is a quantum group algebra. This allows us to use techniques from one area to solve problems in another area.

In this sense, q-mathematics is a powerful tool for understanding and unifying different areas of mathematics. It also has important applications in physics, particularly in the study of string theory and knot theory.

So if you're interested in delving deeper into the world of topology, I highly recommend exploring the fascinating subject of q-mathematics. It will not only deepen your understanding of topology, but also open up new perspectives and connections in other areas of mathematics and physics. Happy exploring!
 
Thread 'LQG Legend Writes Paper Claiming GR Explains Dark Matter Phenomena'
A new group of investigators are attempting something similar to Deur's work, which seeks to explain dark matter phenomena with general relativity corrections to Newtonian gravity is systems like galaxies. Deur's most similar publication to this one along these lines was: One thing that makes this new paper notable is that the corresponding author is Giorgio Immirzi, the person after whom the somewhat mysterious Immirzi parameter of Loop Quantum Gravity is named. I will be reviewing the...
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2503.09804 From the abstract: ... Our derivation uses both EE and the Newtonian approximation of EE in Part I, to describe semi-classically in Part II the advection of DM, created at the level of the universe, into galaxies and clusters thereof. This advection happens proportional with their own classically generated gravitational field g, due to self-interaction of the gravitational field. It is based on the universal formula ρD =λgg′2 for the densityρ D of DM...

Similar threads

Back
Top