MHB JOHN's question at Yahoo Answers involving Lagrange multipliers

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on maximizing the cross-sectional area of a rectangular beam cut from an elliptical log with semiaxes of 2 feet and 1 foot using Lagrange multipliers. The objective function for the area is defined as A(x,y) = 4xy, subject to the constraint g(x,y) = x^2 + 4y^2 - 4 = 0. By applying Lagrange multipliers, the equations lead to the relationship x^2 = 4y^2, which is then substituted back into the constraint to find y^2 = 1/2. Ultimately, this results in a maximum area of 4 ft² for the rectangular cross-section of the beam. This method demonstrates the application of optimization techniques in calculus.
MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here is the question:

Calc 3 Lagrange multiplier question?

What is the maximal cross-sectional area of a rectangular beam cut from an elliptical log with semiaxis of length 2 feet and 1 foot?

I need help on applying the method of lagrange to this scenario. Thank you

Here is a link to the question:

Calc 3 Lagrange multiplier question? - Yahoo! Answers

I have posted a link there to this topic so the OP can find my response.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello JOHN,

I would choose to orient my coordinate axes such that the origin coincides with the center of the elliptical cross-section of the log, where all linear measures are in ft. Now looking only at the first quadrant, let's let the upper right vertex of the cross section of the rectangular beam be at $(x,y)$. Hence, adding the other 3 quadrants, we find the area of this rectangular cross-section, i.e., our objective function is:

$$A(x,y)=4xy$$

subject to the constraint:

$$g(x,y)=x^2+4y^2-4=0$$

Using Lagrange multipliers, we obtain the system:

$$4y=\lambda(2x)$$

$$4x=\lambda(8y)$$

Solving both for $\lambda$, and equating, we find:

$$\lambda=\frac{4y}{2x}=\frac{4x}{8y}$$

Simplifying, we find:

$$x^2=4y^2$$

Substituting this into the constraint, we find:

$$4y^2+4y^2=4$$

Solving for $y^2$, we find:

$$y^2=\frac{1}{2}$$

and since:

$$x=2y$$, as we have taken the positive root given the two variables are in the first quadrant, we find:

$$A_{\text{max}}=A(2y,y)=8y^2=8\cdot\frac{1}{2}=4$$

Hence, the maximal area of the rectangular cross-section of the beam is $4\text{ ft}^2$.

To JOHN and any other guest viewing this topic, I invite and encourage you to post other optimization with constraint problems in our http://www.mathhelpboards.com/f10/ forum.

Best Regards,

Mark.
 
Thread 'Erroneously  finding discrepancy in transpose rule'
Obviously, there is something elementary I am missing here. To form the transpose of a matrix, one exchanges rows and columns, so the transpose of a scalar, considered as (or isomorphic to) a one-entry matrix, should stay the same, including if the scalar is a complex number. On the other hand, in the isomorphism between the complex plane and the real plane, a complex number a+bi corresponds to a matrix in the real plane; taking the transpose we get which then corresponds to a-bi...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K