MHB JOHN's question at Yahoo Answers involving Lagrange multipliers

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on maximizing the cross-sectional area of a rectangular beam cut from an elliptical log with semiaxes of 2 feet and 1 foot using Lagrange multipliers. The objective function for the area is defined as A(x,y) = 4xy, subject to the constraint g(x,y) = x^2 + 4y^2 - 4 = 0. By applying Lagrange multipliers, the equations lead to the relationship x^2 = 4y^2, which is then substituted back into the constraint to find y^2 = 1/2. Ultimately, this results in a maximum area of 4 ft² for the rectangular cross-section of the beam. This method demonstrates the application of optimization techniques in calculus.
MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here is the question:

Calc 3 Lagrange multiplier question?

What is the maximal cross-sectional area of a rectangular beam cut from an elliptical log with semiaxis of length 2 feet and 1 foot?

I need help on applying the method of lagrange to this scenario. Thank you

Here is a link to the question:

Calc 3 Lagrange multiplier question? - Yahoo! Answers

I have posted a link there to this topic so the OP can find my response.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello JOHN,

I would choose to orient my coordinate axes such that the origin coincides with the center of the elliptical cross-section of the log, where all linear measures are in ft. Now looking only at the first quadrant, let's let the upper right vertex of the cross section of the rectangular beam be at $(x,y)$. Hence, adding the other 3 quadrants, we find the area of this rectangular cross-section, i.e., our objective function is:

$$A(x,y)=4xy$$

subject to the constraint:

$$g(x,y)=x^2+4y^2-4=0$$

Using Lagrange multipliers, we obtain the system:

$$4y=\lambda(2x)$$

$$4x=\lambda(8y)$$

Solving both for $\lambda$, and equating, we find:

$$\lambda=\frac{4y}{2x}=\frac{4x}{8y}$$

Simplifying, we find:

$$x^2=4y^2$$

Substituting this into the constraint, we find:

$$4y^2+4y^2=4$$

Solving for $y^2$, we find:

$$y^2=\frac{1}{2}$$

and since:

$$x=2y$$, as we have taken the positive root given the two variables are in the first quadrant, we find:

$$A_{\text{max}}=A(2y,y)=8y^2=8\cdot\frac{1}{2}=4$$

Hence, the maximal area of the rectangular cross-section of the beam is $4\text{ ft}^2$.

To JOHN and any other guest viewing this topic, I invite and encourage you to post other optimization with constraint problems in our http://www.mathhelpboards.com/f10/ forum.

Best Regards,

Mark.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top