Johnson and Shot noise the Frequency Term

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the frequency term in Johnson and Shot noise formulae, clarifying that it refers to the bandwidth of the detecting or analyzing system, particularly in relation to photodiodes. The bandwidth must match the desired signal's bandwidth for accurate detection. Additionally, it highlights that even in DC circuits, frequency is relevant, as DC signals are not perfectly constant and can exhibit variations over time. The conversation emphasizes the importance of sampling duration in low-frequency noise measurement, particularly for 1/f noise.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Johnson and Shot noise principles
  • Familiarity with bandwidth concepts in signal detection
  • Knowledge of DC circuit behavior and frequency implications
  • Experience with Nyquist sampling theorem
NEXT STEPS
  • Research Johnson noise and its mathematical formulation
  • Explore bandwidth considerations in photodiode applications
  • Study the implications of frequency in DC circuits
  • Learn about 1/f noise measurement techniques and sampling strategies
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineers, physicists, and researchers involved in noise measurement and signal processing, particularly those working with photodiodes and low-frequency applications.

Master J
Messages
219
Reaction score
0
I am a bit confused over the frequency term that appears in Johnson and Shot noise formulae. What is this term?

Is it bandwidth? Of what? In relation to say a photodiode, is it the range of frequencies being detected?

And how would this relate to say a DC circuit which no frequency terms at all?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Strictly it's the bandwidth of the detecting/analyzing system/circuit. This could also be the bandwidth of a desired signal since you must use the same bandwidth to detect the signal correctly.

There are cases when it's something a bit different when you have a internal device feedback loop that can see the full noise bandwidth even when the external system has a lower bandwidth - but for most purposes it's the above.

In terms of DC, DC does have frequency. In the words of a microwave engineer I knew who was presented with presentation about "DC testing": "Yes, but what frequency DC?" The guy presenting wasn't a microwave/RF guy so he didn't understand the question. You see for her, 30 MHz was DC. That's the cut-off of an HP 8510 network analyzer's "DC input" that she used. It's all relative.

And at some point in even a "DC" circuit you had to turn on the DC and then later turn off the DC so you minimally have a transfer AC component equal to 1/(time on). But even a DC source isn't perfectly constant - there is always some d/dt.

When you deal with low frequency noise, DC is also relative. Consider that 0.1 Hz is 10 seconds. So when you measure low frequency noise you have to sample (in this case) for say 100 seconds to get 5 point (Nyquist sampling). This is part of the "fun" of measuring noise. This "low frequency/long time" integration is especially common with 1/f noise measurement.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
8K