Jones Vector of Linear Polarization

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the representation of linearly polarized light using Jones vectors, emphasizing that the angle α refers to the orientation of the electric field vector relative to the horizontal. The confusion arises from mixing space and time domains, particularly regarding phase delays between the x and y components. It is clarified that linearly polarized light should have no phase difference, which is reflected in the cosine terms used in the equations. The conversation also touches on the distinction between linear and elliptical polarization, noting that elliptically polarized light introduces a different form involving ellipticity ε. Overall, the key takeaway is the correct formulation of the Jones vector for linearly polarized light without phase differences.
iScience
Messages
466
Reaction score
5
Hi, I understand that the α in the form below refers to angle of E-vector to the horizontal.

wRsKBwS.png


and that a jones vector should be represented this way:

uZebSxl.png


I tried to represent the linearly polarized sin & cos form in the jones vector form

YakoHo5.png
I know I'm doing something wrong because a linearly polarized light should have no phase delays between x & y. I'm just getting my space and time domains mixed up.Thanks
 
Last edited:
Science news on Phys.org
Mainly the reason I am confused is because in my book it gives this form for linearly polarized light:

$$\vec{E}=(\hat{i}E_{0(x)}+\hat{j}E_{0(y)})cos(kz-\omega t)$$

the two components being cosine makes sense because 0 phase difference.

but if i write that in matrix form, shouldn't i also have two cosines, not one cosine and one sine?
 
If I understand your first post, you are on the right track- linearly polarized light with polarization oriented and angle 'α' from the x-axis is indeed written as you say, if you are using linear basis states. The use of 'ε' in your second image makes me wonder if you are now trying to write the Jones vector for elliptically polarized light (with ellipticity ε), which using linear basis states is:

[E_x, E_y] = [cos ε, i sin ε]

which kinda-sorta looks like it can be converted into what you showed.

As for your second post, I am guessing that E_x and E_y are the x- and y- components of E, which again result in E = [E_x, E_y] = E_0 [cos α, sin α] as before. The cos(kz-ωt) refers to the 'wave part', not the polarization, which is simply the direction of E.

Does this help?
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K