Joule Expansion: Cooling Effects & Kinetic Energy

  • Thread starter Thread starter Donkeyking
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Expansion Joule
AI Thread Summary
Joule expansion does not cool ideal gases, but it does induce cooling effects in real gases due to changes in molecular potential energy during expansion. This potential energy increase comes at the expense of the gas's kinetic energy, leading to a decrease in temperature. The relationship between temperature and kinetic energy is explained by the Boltzmann distribution, where lower temperatures correlate with lower average kinetic energy. It's noted that the Joule-Thomson coefficient determines whether cooling occurs during gas expansion. Overall, understanding these principles is crucial for grasping the thermodynamic behavior of gases.
Donkeyking
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I read on 27 chapter from Blundell's Thermal Physics 2nd edition.

For ideal gases, Joule expansion doesn't cool gases. But for real gases, Joule expansion makes cooling effects. And this book(page 314) says that when gases expand, their potential energy of molecular interactions increases(since V is proprtional to 1/r). And this energy is exactly from kinetic energy of gas.(So makes kinetic energy of gas decrease)

What does the last sentence mean? Why does temperature decrease when kinetic energy of gas decrease?

I understand that low temperature makes average kinetic energy decrease(because of Boltzmann distribution, low temperature makes low average kinetic energy)..

Or... Is temperature defined by Boltzmann distribution? If a system has energy distribution of a temperature T, then does it said that the temperature of that system T?

I am sorry for this absurd question.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Donkeyking said:
But for real gases, Joule expansion makes cooling effects.
Not always. It depends on the sign of the Joule-Thomson coefficient.

Donkeyking said:
Or... Is temperature defined by Boltzmann distribution? If a system has energy distribution of a temperature T, then does it said that the temperature of that system T?
It is not defined from the Boltzmann distribution, but at equilibrium, they are equivalent information. Fit a Boltzmann curve to the distribution of velocities and you will get the temperature.
 
DrClaude said:
Not always. It depends on the sign of the Joule-Thomson coefficient.
Dr Claude: Are you sure of this? Joule expansion is expansion into a vacuum as opposed to Joule Thomson isenthalpic expansion.
 
Philip Wood said:
Dr Claude: Are you sure of this? Joule expansion is expansion into a vacuum as opposed to Joule Thomson isenthalpic expansion.
Right. I misread that as Joule-Thomson. At least the rest of my post is still correct :redface:
 
Donkeyking said:
I read on 27 chapter from Blundell's Thermal Physics 2nd edition.

For ideal gases, Joule expansion doesn't cool gases. But for real gases, Joule expansion makes cooling effects. And this book(page 314) says that when gases expand, their potential energy of molecular interactions increases(since V is proprtional to 1/r). And this energy is exactly from kinetic energy of gas.(So makes kinetic energy of gas decrease)

What does the last sentence mean? Why does temperature decrease when kinetic energy of gas decrease?

I understand that low temperature makes average kinetic energy decrease(because of Boltzmann distribution, low temperature makes low average kinetic energy)..

Or... Is temperature defined by Boltzmann distribution? If a system has energy distribution of a temperature T, then does it said that the temperature of that system T?

I am sorry for this absurd question.

Temperature is average kinetic energy of the molecules.

Joule (free) expansion produces a very small change in temperature. Masuring the Joule coefficient is very difficult. As you say, for an ideal gas the Joule coefficient = 0.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top