Bill Clinton's recent visit to North Korea to secure the release of two American journalists has sparked significant debate. Critics, particularly John Bolton, argue that this move rewards North Korea's bad behavior and undermines diplomatic efforts regarding nuclear negotiations. Bolton suggests that a more aggressive stance would be preferable, implying that appeasement could worsen the situation. The discussion also touches on historical precedents, with some referencing past U.S. policies that involved covert dealings with North Korea. Despite the criticisms, many express relief at the safe return of the journalists, viewing Clinton's intervention as a necessary and effective action. The U.S. administration, through national security adviser Jim Jones, verified the legitimacy of the North Korean offer for Clinton's visit, which ultimately led to the journalists' release without any apparent concessions regarding nuclear issues. Overall, the situation highlights the complexities of U.S.-North Korea relations and the differing opinions on how best to handle such diplomatic crises.
And we all know that the best way to handle a scared, wild dog, is to kick him until he starts to obey.
