Jumbled up spectra of stars/glaxies

  • Thread starter Thread starter terahertz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spectra
AI Thread Summary
Astronomers analyze the jumbled spectra of stars and galaxies by identifying dominant elements through their unique emission and absorption lines. Despite the complexity introduced by Doppler shifts, these shifts do not alter the relative positions of spectral lines, allowing for accurate identification of elements. By determining the ratios of known lines from laboratory measurements, astronomers can adjust for redshift and match observed lines to specific elements. This systematic approach ensures that each line corresponds uniquely to an element, eliminating confusion. Ultimately, the distinctiveness of spectral lines enables precise analysis of celestial radiation.
terahertz
Messages
20
Reaction score
1
When you look at the emission/absorption spectrum of a single element, you can clearly see various emission/absorption lines, which are characteristic of that element. However, radiation from stars/galaxies contains spectra of many elements. How do astronomers make sense of this jumbled-up spectrum? In other words, how do they know that an absorption line, for instance, comes from this element and not that, especially since the spectra are doppler-shifted?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Doppler-shift does not change the fractions of wavelengths. Typically a few elements are dominant in the spectrum, once you identify at least one of them (via those ratios) you know redshift and can adjust the whole spectrum. Afterwards you can look up all lines in tables.
 
  • Like
Likes davenn
Since spectral lines of each element are unique, there is actually no room to mistake which line comes from which element. Similarly, Doppler shift doesn't pose a problem, since it always affects the whole spectrum, preserving the line patterns.

E.g.
Imagine we've determined absorption lines of elements A, B, C and D in a lab. Their lines have positions:
A = 2, 5, 9, 14
B = 4, 6, 11
C = 3, 12
D = 1, 7, 13

If you then observe a spectrum with the following lines:
2 4 5 7 8 12 13 14

There's only one way to fit the elements in there (and determine how Doppler shifted it is).
 
  • Like
Likes terahertz
Thanks a lot for your enlightening response. Your simple example clarified a lot of things!
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Both have short pulses of emission and a wide spectral bandwidth, covering a wide variety of frequencies: "Fast Radio Bursts (FRBs) are detected over a wide range of radio frequencies, including frequencies around 1400 MHz, but have also been detected at lower frequencies, particularly in the 400–800 MHz range. Russian astronomers recently detected a powerful burst at 111 MHz, expanding our understanding of the FRB range. Frequency Ranges: 1400 MHz: Many of the known FRBs have been detected...
Back
Top