Do you jump higher when you run and jump, or just stand and jump?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter romsofia
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Jump
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around whether individuals jump higher when they run and jump compared to standing and jumping. It explores the mechanics of jumping, including the role of horizontal and vertical kinetic energy, and the influence of technique on jump height.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants believe that running and jumping results in a higher jump compared to standing jumps.
  • One participant suggests that the highest jumps may involve complex gymnastic moves that utilize both linear and angular kinetic energy.
  • It is proposed that the effectiveness of running before jumping depends on the approach angle, with a head-on approach requiring greater speed to clear a height.
  • Some participants argue that the human body cannot effectively convert horizontal kinetic energy into vertical kinetic energy, limiting the benefits of running before a jump.
  • Another viewpoint suggests that using legs as inelastic vaulting poles can allow for some conversion of horizontal kinetic energy into vertical kinetic energy, especially when the legs are positioned at an angle.
  • There is a claim that with proper technique, a jump with horizontal speed can exceed the height of a standing jump, even with a one-foot takeoff.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the mechanics of jumping, particularly regarding the conversion of kinetic energy and the effectiveness of running versus standing jumps. No consensus is reached on the optimal approach for maximizing jump height.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the mechanics of jumping and the role of energy conversion, which may not be universally accepted or fully resolved.

romsofia
Gold Member
Messages
600
Reaction score
330
Hi, do you jump higher when you run and jump, or just stand and jump?

I believe you jump higher if you run and jump.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Run and jump would be higher. The highest would be a gymnastic type flip flop move into a high back dive or flip. Two foot take offs are not allowed in high jump contests though.
 
Hi romsofia! :smile:
romsofia said:
Hi, do you jump higher when you run and jump, or just stand and jump?

I believe you jump higher if you run and jump.

I think the running part is primarily because you need to move your centre of mass horizontally far enough to clear your body of the bar.

If you approach almost sideways, you can get away with a very slow run, since you only have to move a distance slightly greater than the width of your shoulders or hips.

But if you approach almost head-on, you need to run much faster, since you have to move a distance comparable with your height.

Since the human body has no way of converting KE to elastic PE (and since neither shoes nor the ground can store much elastic PE), it is almost impossible to convert the extra "horizontal KE" from running into elastic PE and then back again to "vertical KE" … so extra horizontal speed doesn't help produce extra vertical motion.
 
tiny-tim said:
Since the human body has no way of converting KE to elastic PE (and since neither shoes nor the ground can store much elastic PE), it is almost impossible to convert the extra "horizontal KE" from running into elastic PE and then back again to "vertical KE" … so extra horizontal speed doesn't help produce extra vertical motion.
A better analogy would be that a person uses his leg or legs as mostly inelastic vaulting poles. In the case of the gymnastic move I mentioned angular KE is used in addition to linear KE.
 
rcgldr said:
A better analogy would be that a person uses his leg or legs as mostly inelastic vaulting poles. In the case of the gymnastic move I mentioned angular KE is used in addition to linear KE.
I agree, it is possible to convert some of the horizontal kinetic energy into vertical kinetic energy by placing the leg (or two legs) at an angle (lower than 90 degrees) to the ground, absorbing the radial kinetic energy and keeping tangential kinetic energy (which has a positive vertical component). The principle is similar to a pole vault (leg working as a pole), which can work even with a pole that only absorbs radial kinetic energy, without returning it elasticly - of course the effect is weaker than in case of the elasic pole.

Also I am certain that when jumping with with two foot take off+horizontal speed anyone can jump higher than with two foot take off from rest. With the right technique even one foot take off with horizontal speed might be higher than two foot take off from rest.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 76 ·
3
Replies
76
Views
31K