Just a thought experiment on fluid mechanics.

AI Thread Summary
In a thought experiment regarding fluid mechanics, a scenario is presented where a wooden block is submerged in water within an accelerating elevator. The discussion references Einstein's considerations on gravitational and inertial mass, leading to the conclusion that they are equivalent in the context of General Relativity. When the elevator accelerates upwards, the effective weight of the block increases due to the added acceleration, affecting its buoyancy. The logic follows that the block's weight must equal the buoyant force based on the displaced water's weight, which also increases under acceleration. The inquiry focuses on whether the block's position relative to the water changes during this acceleration, prompting further exploration of buoyancy principles.
nil1996
Messages
301
Reaction score
7
I am thinking that...
if a tank of water which contains a small wooden block is kept in an elevator which is accelerating upwards from rest, will the block get more dipped or remains constant position with respect to water??
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You are describing a thought experiment that Einstein considered while formulating GR. He was trying to resolve the apparent difference between gravitational mass and inertial mass. In the end GR postulated that they are one and the same.

In your case, you could simply ask what how would the tank of water and block react in a heavier gravitational environment.
 
So what do you think about it?:smile:
 
I am grade 12 and just thinking it while reading my fluid mechanics lesson. When the lift is not accelerating the weight of the block must be equal to the buoyancy force as the block is in equilibrium. When the lift stats accelerating the mass of the block becomes m(g+a),where a is acceleration of lift. Now according to the Archimedes principle weight of the block must be equal to the weight of the water displaced by the block.So the weight of the water will be its mass*(g+a). Is my logic and maths correct??
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top