Just when I started to get things straught in my head.

  • Thread starter Thread starter bm0p700f
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Head
bm0p700f
Messages
125
Reaction score
0
http://www.fourmilab.ch/cship/timedial.html

Gives a formula for time dilation which is repeated in many other soucres. In this version t'/to increases with v. Its time dilation time is meant to slow?

http://www.phys.unsw.edu.au/einsteinlight/jw/module4_time_dilation.htm

A useful set of pages for those wanting to learn. The derivation for time dilation is in the form I am familiar with as v increas t'/to decreases, time dilation I understand. Two different equations for the same thing cannot be right?

I don't solve problems with SR, I have never needed to but still I try to undersand. Can someone help resolve this apparent problem.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bm0p700f said:
http://www.fourmilab.ch/cship/timedial.html

Gives a formula for time dilation which is repeated in many other soucres. In this version t'/to increases with v. Its time dilation time is meant to slow?

http://www.phys.unsw.edu.au/einsteinlight/jw/module4_time_dilation.htm

A useful set of pages for those wanting to learn. The derivation for time dilation is in the form I am familiar with as v increas t'/to decreases, time dilation I understand. Two different equations for the same thing cannot be right?

I don't solve problems with SR, I have never needed to but still I try to undersand. Can someone help resolve this apparent problem.

They are both using the same formula, but different conventions for variable names. In the first page t' is the time on the moving ship for a stationary observer, and t is the observer's own time.

On the second page, T is the time of a tick on Zoe's clock as Jasper observes it, and T' is the time of a tick on the same clock, as Zoe sees it herself.

Thus the prime is used differently on the two pages. In the first page t' is time on a clock moving wrt to the observer; and on the second T' is the time on the observer's own clock.

Cheers -- sylas
 
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy

Similar threads

Back
Top