Ka vs. Ku communication satellites

  • Thread starter senmeis
  • Start date
54
0
Hi,

I’ve heard Ku communication satellites have a broader coverage while Ka satellites only support spot beams. Is it correct?

Senmeis
 

berkeman

Mentor
55,907
5,964
Can you link to where you heard/read this? And is this article helpful?

 
54
0
Statement from your link:

Spot beams are ‘hotter’ than conventional wide beams which must spread their energy across a wider area, and therefore have a greater ability to cut through weather. HTS systems are also designed to dynamically adjust their characteristics, such as individual beam power, to account for atmospheric conditions in a particular sub-region.

That is what I mean, but the word „ONLY“ may be exaggerated.

Senmeis
 
7,690
4,373
Statement from your link:

Spot beams are ‘hotter’ than conventional wide beams which must spread their energy across a wider area, and therefore have a greater ability to cut through weather. HTS systems are also designed to dynamically adjust their characteristics, such as individual beam power, to account for atmospheric conditions in a particular sub-region.

That is what I mean, but the word „ONLY“ may be exaggerated.


Senmeis
That's true, but the sentence just before that one implies that it applies to both KA snd KU.

In addition to this, new High Throughput Satellite (HTS) systems also better enable Ka- and Ku- alike to overcome weather issues, as compared to traditional wide beam systems.
 

Related Threads for: Ka vs. Ku communication satellites

Replies
2
Views
483
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
10K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
9
Views
13K
  • Last Post
Replies
18
Views
10K
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
5K
Top