Keep a Marble in Motion for 2 Minutes - Ideas & Your Thoughts

  • Thread starter Thread starter Steve B.
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Marble Motion
AI Thread Summary
To keep a marble in motion for two minutes with only a single initial touch, one suggestion is to use a bucket that allows the marble to spin along the walls. Another idea involves a teeter-totter mechanism with a long plastic tube where the marble is placed inside, and alternating pulls on the ends keep it moving. A pendulum-like setup could also be considered, utilizing gravity and momentum. The challenge is to design a system that maintains motion without further manual intervention after the initial push. Creative engineering solutions are essential for achieving continuous motion.
Steve B.
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
How can I keep a marble in motion for 2 minutes?

I've had 2 suggestions so far:

*A simple way would be to put a marble in a bucket and move the bucket so the marble spins along the walls.

*Another idea is to have a teeter-totter, using a long plastic tube. Have a string attached to each side. Put he marble in one one of the tube and pull the other one down. Then alternate pulling an end down to keep the marble moving. Have and caps on the tube so the marble can't escape.

But, if i can only touch it once and that's to start if off. how can i do that way?

Your thoughts?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
#cough# pendulum #cough#
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top