Kelvin Scale Accuracy: Why 1K = 1°C?

  • Thread starter Thread starter CheesyPeeps
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Accuracy Kelvin
AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies that the Kelvin scale is not inherently more accurate than the Celsius scale; rather, it is preferred in thermodynamics because it uses absolute zero as its zero point. This allows for simpler calculations in thermodynamic equations. Both scales have equal increments, with 1K equating to a change of 1°C, but the Kelvin scale's absolute starting point is more universally applicable in scientific contexts. Misunderstandings about the accuracy of the Kelvin scale may stem from misconceptions taught in educational settings. Ultimately, the choice of scale depends on the context of the measurement rather than inherent accuracy.
CheesyPeeps
Messages
36
Reaction score
2
Why is the Kelvin scale more accurate than the Celsius scale when a change of 1K is equal to a change of 1°C? It's something I've always wondered about but never looked into.

(Apologies if the answer is incredibly simple. I'm still very new to the world of physics :smile:)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Accuracy and precision are properties of the measuring device, not the measurement scale. You could have an accurate thermometer marked in Celcius and an inaccurate thermometer marked in Kelvin.

The advantage of Kelvin over Celsius is that the zero point in Kelvin is absolute zero while the zero point in Celsius is just the freeing point of water. When doing thermodynamics the formulas become simpler when 0 is set to absolute zero.
 
Ah, that makes sense. I definitely see why Kelvin is advantageous.
Thanks a lot!
 
CheesyPeeps said:
Why is the Kelvin scale more accurate than the Celsius scale when a change of 1K is equal to a change of 1°C? It's something I've always wondered about but never looked into.

Where did you get the idea that the Kelvin scale is more accurate than the Celsius scale?

We tend to use the Kelvin scale in many situations in physics not because it is more accurate. But rather, that is considered, in thermodynamics, as the "absolute" scale. It has nothing to do with accuracy, as DaleSpam stated.

Zz.
 
ZapperZ said:
Where did you get the idea that the Kelvin scale is more accurate than the Celsius scale?

My physics teacher told the class it was more accurate, which I knew didn't make sense since 1K and 1°C are equal in size.
Thanks for clearing things up for me. That saved me from a lot more confusion!
 
CheesyPeeps said:
My physics teacher told the class it was more accurate, which I knew didn't make sense since 1K and 1°C are equal in size.
Thanks for clearing things up for me. That saved me from a lot more confusion!

Either you heard wrong, or that teacher has a very poor understanding of physics.
 
The K scale makes much more sense, in any case, as it starts at Zero. Any Physics lab on another planet could easily choose the same starting point. Of course, the step size would still be a bit arbitrary. Some (just one) other defined temperature would need to be chosen and they we could converse with them about Thermodynamics with no trouble.
The fact that we could never actually get to 0K, is a mere detail. . . . .
 
Back
Top