Kepler-9 b,c planets discovered

  • Thread starter Thread starter Orion1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Planets
AI Thread Summary
On August 26, 2010, NASA announced the discovery of two planets, Kepler-9b and Kepler-9c, orbiting the sun-like star Kepler-9, marking the first confirmed planetary system with multiple transiting planets. Kepler-9b has a mass of 0.252 MJ and orbits the star every 19.24 days, while Kepler-9c has a mass of 0.171 MJ with a 38.91-day orbit. The discovery resulted from seven months of observations of over 156,000 stars in the search for Earth-sized planets. Additionally, a potential third planet, possibly a super-Earth, was identified, but further observations are needed to confirm its existence. This finding contributes to the ongoing exploration of exoplanets and their characteristics.
Orion1
Messages
961
Reaction score
3

c1main.nasa.planets.jpg


On August 26, 2010, scientists announced the discovery of two planets orbiting around Kepler-9.

Kepler-9 b - 0.252 MJ - 0.14 AU - 19.24 days
Kepler-9 c - 0.171 MJ - 0.225 AU - 38.91 days
[/Color]
Reference:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kepler-9"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
More details...


http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/kepler/news/two_planet_orbit.html

NASA's Kepler spacecraft has discovered the first confirmed planetary system with more than one planet crossing in front of, or transiting, the same star.

The transit signatures of two distinct planets were seen in the data for the sun-like star designated Kepler-9. The planets were named Kepler-9b and 9c. The discovery incorporates seven months of observations of more than 156,000 stars as part of an ongoing search for Earth-sized planets outside our solar system. The findings will be published in Thursday's issue of the journal Science.

-----

--diogenesNY
 
diogenesNY said:
More details...http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/kepler/news/two_planet_orbit.html

NASA's Kepler spacecraft has discovered the first confirmed planetary system with more than one planet crossing in front of, or transiting, the same star.

The transit signatures of two distinct planets were seen in the data for the sun-like star designated Kepler-9. The planets were named Kepler-9b and 9c. The discovery incorporates seven months of observations of more than 156,000 stars as part of an ongoing search for Earth-sized planets outside our solar system. The findings will be published in Thursday's issue of the journal Science.

-----

--diogenesNY

Cool find (though not exactly Earth-like. They're 500-1000x the mass of Earth.)
 
Ooh!
In addition to the two confirmed giant planets, Kepler scientists also have identified what appears to be a third, much smaller transit signature in the observations of Kepler-9. That signature is consistent with the transits of a super-Earth-sized planet about 1.5 times the radius of Earth...

Oh...
...in a scorching, near-sun 1.6 day-orbit.

Ah.
Additional observations are required to determine whether this signal is indeed a planet or an astronomical phenomenon that mimics the appearance of a transit.
 
DaveC426913 said:
Cool find (though not exactly Earth-like. They're 500-1000x the mass of Earth.)
Many exoplanets have masses several times that of Jupiter, but the Kepler planets are relatively small.

"The observations show Kepler-9b is the larger of the two planets, and both have masses similar to but less than Saturn. Kepler-9b lies closest to the star with an orbit of about 19 days, while Kepler-9c has an orbit of about 38 days."

Ref: http://www.nasa.gov/centers/ames/news/releases/2010/10-73AR.html

Based on the masses 0.252 MJ and 0.171 MJ cited by Orion1 from Wikipedia, those are roughly 80 Mearth and 54 Mearth, respectively. Jupiter is about 318 Mearth.

cf http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jupiter_mass
 
Last edited:
Astronuc said:
Many exoplanets have masses several times that of Jupiter, but the Kepler planets are relatively small.
Oh I know, I've been following them closely over the years with frequent visits to http://exoplanet.eu/catalog-all.php" .

It's just that Kepler is a search for smaller planets.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top