Keppler's third law and the speed of cellestial bodies.

AI Thread Summary
Keppler's third law indicates that the velocity of an object orbiting the sun is directly related to its average distance from the sun, with a larger radius resulting in lower orbital velocity. The centripetal force necessary for maintaining an orbit is influenced by gravitational force, leading to the conclusion that as an object moves farther away, its speed decreases. In elliptical orbits, the object accelerates as it approaches the sun (perigee) and decelerates as it moves away (apogee). The discussion also references the mathematical relationship between gravitational force and centripetal force, ultimately leading to the derivation of Kepler's third law. Understanding these principles is essential for grasping orbital mechanics and gravitational interactions.
Nikitin
Messages
734
Reaction score
27
Hi. Keppler's third law implicates that the velocity of an object orbiting around our sun is directly dependant on the object's average distance to the sun... Afterall, if the velocity of be more irregular, then no constant would exist.

I realize this probably has something to do with the average centripetal force provided by the gravity of the sun...

I was thinking that this is because the longer away an object is the bigger its orbit and thus the smaller the average centripetal force and thus one could assume that it is possible that the speed must be smaller as well? mass*(v^2)/r=centripetal force. But then again the radius r is also bigger if the orbit is bigger and that allows for a larger speed..

bah.

And:

The next sub-chapter of my physics book it is about Newton's work with gravity and using that jazz to prove keppler's laws.. So maybe I will find out eventually tho still I'd appreciate it if you people could make some simple explanations.
 
Last edited:
Science news on Phys.org
The larger the radius, the lower the velocity must be in order to sustain an orbit. In an elliptical orbit the orbiting body moves faster as the distance between it and the larger body decreases, with a max velocity at its closest approach, perigee. After that it slows down until it reaches apogee, or farthest approach.
 
Nikitin said:
Hi. Keppler's third law implicates that the velocity of an object orbiting around our sun is directly dependant on the object's average distance to the sun... Afterall, if the velocity of be more irregular, then no constant would exist.

I realize this probably has something to do with the average centripetal force provided by the gravity of the sun...

I was thinking that this is because the longer away an object is the bigger its orbit and thus the smaller the average centripetal force and thus one could assume that it is possible that the speed must be smaller as well? mass*(v^2)/r=centripetal force. But then again the radius r is also bigger if the orbit is bigger and that allows for a larger speed..

bah.

In a simple case, consider a circular orbit where the centripetal force needed to maintain the circular path is equal to the force of gravity or:

\frac{GMm}{r^2}= \frac{mv^2}{r}

This reduces to

\frac{GM}{r} = v^2

Given that the period(P) is the time it would take for the object to travel a distance of 2\pi r

A little algebra will get you

P^2 = 4 \pi^2 \frac{r^3}{GM}

Which demonstrates Kepler's third law.
 
thanks=) everyone

janus: I'll be learning about that formula you posted (force of gravity) in the next sub-chapter chapter
 
After reading the next chapter, I understand everything, Janus. A very elegant explanation imo^^
 
I was watching a Khan Academy video on entropy called: Reconciling thermodynamic and state definitions of entropy. So in the video it says: Let's say I have a container. And in that container, I have gas particles and they're bouncing around like gas particles tend to do, creating some pressure on the container of a certain volume. And let's say I have n particles. Now, each of these particles could be in x different states. Now, if each of them can be in x different states, how many total...
Thread 'Why work is PdV and not (P+dP)dV in an isothermal process?'
Let's say we have a cylinder of volume V1 with a frictionless movable piston and some gas trapped inside with pressure P1 and temperature T1. On top of the piston lay some small pebbles that add weight and essentially create the pressure P1. Also the system is inside a reservoir of water that keeps its temperature constant at T1. The system is in equilibrium at V1, P1, T1. Now let's say i put another very small pebble on top of the piston (0,00001kg) and after some seconds the system...
I need to calculate the amount of water condensed from a DX cooling coil per hour given the size of the expansion coil (the total condensing surface area), the incoming air temperature, the amount of air flow from the fan, the BTU capacity of the compressor and the incoming air humidity. There are lots of condenser calculators around but they all need the air flow and incoming and outgoing humidity and then give a total volume of condensed water but I need more than that. The size of the...
Back
Top