Kernel subsets of transformations

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving the equivalence between the existence of a linear transformation \( S: \mathbb{R}^n \rightarrow \mathbb{R}^n \) such that \( T_1 = S \circ T_2 \) and the condition \( \ker T_2 \subset \ker T_1 \). The proof demonstrates that if \( S \) exists, then any vector in the kernel of \( T_2 \) must also be in the kernel of \( T_1 \). Conversely, if \( \ker T_2 \subset \ker T_1 \), a suitable linear transformation \( S \) can be constructed to satisfy the equation \( T_1 = S \circ T_2 \).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of linear transformations in vector spaces
  • Knowledge of kernel and image of linear maps
  • Familiarity with the composition of functions
  • Basic proficiency in linear algebra concepts
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of linear transformations in depth
  • Learn about the rank-nullity theorem in linear algebra
  • Explore the implications of kernel relationships in linear mappings
  • Investigate examples of linear transformations and their compositions
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in linear algebra, mathematicians focusing on functional analysis, and anyone interested in the theoretical foundations of linear transformations.

dustbin
Messages
239
Reaction score
6

Homework Statement



Let [itex]T_1,T_2:ℝ^n\rightarrowℝ^n[/itex] be linear transformations. Show that [itex]\exists S:ℝ^n\rightarrowℝ^n[/itex] s.t. [itex]T_1=S\circ T_2 \Longleftrightarrow kerT_2\subset kerT_1[/itex].

The Attempt at a Solution



[itex](\Longrightarrow)[/itex] Let [itex]S:ℝ^n\rightarrowℝ^n[/itex] be a linear transformation s.t. [itex]T_1 = S\circ T_2[/itex] and let [itex]\vec{v}\in kerT_2[/itex]. Then [itex]S(T_2(\vec{v})) = S(\vec{0}) = \vec{0}[/itex] by linearity. Then [itex]T_1(\vec{v}) = \vec{0}[/itex]. Thus [itex]\vec{v}\in kerT_1 \quad \forall\vec{v}\in kerT_2[/itex]. Therefore [itex]kerT_2 \subset kerT_1[/itex].

[itex](\Longleftarrow)[/itex] Suppose that [itex]kerT_2\subset kerT_1[/itex] and choose [itex]S:ℝ^n\rightarrowℝ^n[/itex] s.t. [itex]S[/itex] is linear and [itex]T_1 = S\circ T_2[/itex]. Then for [itex]\vec{v}\in kerT_2,\quad T_1(\vec{v}) = S(T_2(\vec{v}) = S(\vec{0}) = \vec{0}.[/itex] Thus there exists such a transformation.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
dustbin said:

Homework Statement



Let [itex]T_1,T_2:ℝ^n\rightarrowℝ^n[/itex] be linear transformations. Show that [itex]\exists S:ℝ^n\rightarrowℝ^n[/itex] s.t. [itex]T_1=S\circ T_2 \Longleftrightarrow kerT_2\subset kerT_1[/itex].

The Attempt at a Solution



[itex](\Longrightarrow)[/itex] Let [itex]S:ℝ^n\rightarrowℝ^n[/itex] be a linear transformation s.t. [itex]T_1 = S\circ T_2[/itex] and let [itex]\vec{v}\in kerT_2[/itex]. Then [itex]S(T_2(\vec{v})) = S(\vec{0}) = \vec{0}[/itex] by linearity. Then [itex]T_1(\vec{v}) = \vec{0}[/itex]. Thus [itex]\vec{v}\in kerT_1 \quad \forall\vec{v}\in kerT_2[/itex]. Therefore [itex]kerT_2 \subset kerT_1[/itex].

[itex](\Longleftarrow)[/itex] Suppose that [itex]kerT_2\subset kerT_1[/itex] and choose [itex]S:ℝ^n\rightarrowℝ^n[/itex] s.t. [itex]S[/itex] is linear and [itex]T_1 = S\circ T_2[/itex]. Then for [itex]\vec{v}\in kerT_2,\quad T_1(\vec{v}) = S(T_2(\vec{v}) = S(\vec{0}) = \vec{0}.[/itex] Thus there exists such a transformation.

The first part seems ok. For the second, the problem is to show that such an S exists given ker(T2) is contained in ker(T1). Not to assume it exists.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
Replies
34
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K