Kernel subsets of transformations

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 1K views
dustbin
Messages
239
Reaction score
6

Homework Statement



Let [itex]T_1,T_2:ℝ^n\rightarrowℝ^n[/itex] be linear transformations. Show that [itex]\exists S:ℝ^n\rightarrowℝ^n[/itex] s.t. [itex]T_1=S\circ T_2 \Longleftrightarrow kerT_2\subset kerT_1[/itex].

The Attempt at a Solution



[itex](\Longrightarrow)[/itex] Let [itex]S:ℝ^n\rightarrowℝ^n[/itex] be a linear transformation s.t. [itex]T_1 = S\circ T_2[/itex] and let [itex]\vec{v}\in kerT_2[/itex]. Then [itex]S(T_2(\vec{v})) = S(\vec{0}) = \vec{0}[/itex] by linearity. Then [itex]T_1(\vec{v}) = \vec{0}[/itex]. Thus [itex]\vec{v}\in kerT_1 \quad \forall\vec{v}\in kerT_2[/itex]. Therefore [itex]kerT_2 \subset kerT_1[/itex].

[itex](\Longleftarrow)[/itex] Suppose that [itex]kerT_2\subset kerT_1[/itex] and choose [itex]S:ℝ^n\rightarrowℝ^n[/itex] s.t. [itex]S[/itex] is linear and [itex]T_1 = S\circ T_2[/itex]. Then for [itex]\vec{v}\in kerT_2,\quad T_1(\vec{v}) = S(T_2(\vec{v}) = S(\vec{0}) = \vec{0}.[/itex] Thus there exists such a transformation.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
dustbin said:

Homework Statement



Let [itex]T_1,T_2:ℝ^n\rightarrowℝ^n[/itex] be linear transformations. Show that [itex]\exists S:ℝ^n\rightarrowℝ^n[/itex] s.t. [itex]T_1=S\circ T_2 \Longleftrightarrow kerT_2\subset kerT_1[/itex].

The Attempt at a Solution



[itex](\Longrightarrow)[/itex] Let [itex]S:ℝ^n\rightarrowℝ^n[/itex] be a linear transformation s.t. [itex]T_1 = S\circ T_2[/itex] and let [itex]\vec{v}\in kerT_2[/itex]. Then [itex]S(T_2(\vec{v})) = S(\vec{0}) = \vec{0}[/itex] by linearity. Then [itex]T_1(\vec{v}) = \vec{0}[/itex]. Thus [itex]\vec{v}\in kerT_1 \quad \forall\vec{v}\in kerT_2[/itex]. Therefore [itex]kerT_2 \subset kerT_1[/itex].

[itex](\Longleftarrow)[/itex] Suppose that [itex]kerT_2\subset kerT_1[/itex] and choose [itex]S:ℝ^n\rightarrowℝ^n[/itex] s.t. [itex]S[/itex] is linear and [itex]T_1 = S\circ T_2[/itex]. Then for [itex]\vec{v}\in kerT_2,\quad T_1(\vec{v}) = S(T_2(\vec{v}) = S(\vec{0}) = \vec{0}.[/itex] Thus there exists such a transformation.

The first part seems ok. For the second, the problem is to show that such an S exists given ker(T2) is contained in ker(T1). Not to assume it exists.
 
Last edited: