Killing vectors for Anti desitter space in 3+1

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jim Kata
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Space Vectors
Jim Kata
Messages
197
Reaction score
10
I'm trying to derive the lie algebra for Anti desitter space in 3+1 I know it's O(4,1) and I think I understand that but I'm taking different approach. I tried to derive the conformal killing vectors by solving Killing's equation, but when I got my solution the conformal factor vanished :confused: .

The solution I got for the Killing vectors is:




<br /> \xi _t = - r\sqrt {1 + \left( {r/R} \right)^2 } \sin \theta \left( {A\sin \phi \cos \left( {t/R} \right) - B\cos \phi \cos (t/R) + C\sin \phi \sin (t/R)} \right)<br />

<br /> \xi _r = \frac{R}<br /> {{\sqrt {1 + \left( {r/R} \right)^2 } }}\sin \theta \left( {A\sin \phi \sin (t/R) - B\cos \phi \sin (t/R) - C\sin \phi \cos (t/R) + D\cos \phi \cos \left( {t/R} \right)} \right)<br />

<br /> \xi _\theta = rR\sqrt {1 + \left( {r/R} \right)^2 } \cos \theta \left( {A\sin \phi \sin \left( {t/R} \right) - B\cos \phi \sin \left( {t/R} \right) - C\sin \phi \cos \left( {t/R} \right) + D\cos \phi \cos \left( {t/R} \right)} \right)<br />

<br /> \xi _\phi = rR\sqrt {1 + \left( {r/R} \right)^2 } \sin \theta \left( {A\cos \phi \sin \left( {t/R} \right) + B\sin \phi \sin \left( {t/R} \right) - C\cos \phi \cos \left( {t/R} \right) - D\sin \phi \cos \left( {t/R} \right)} \right)<br />

These do satisfy the killing equation, but I feel like i"m missing something.

they only has 4 unknowns A, B, C, D not 10 like SO(1,4), also I don't understand how Teitelbohm and Henneaux got their lie algebra in their paper asymptotically anti de sitter spaces.

Any help will be much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To find the isometry group of AdS(n,m) consider its embedding in M(n,m+1) (Minkowski spacewith one extra time dimension). We can consider AdS as the set of points in M such that x2 = -R2.
Now consider the isometries of M that leave AdS invarient; it is not hard to show that this is O(n,m+1); hence O(n,m+1)< Iso(AdS(n,m));
As dim(O(n,m+1)) = (N2-N)/2 = (n+m)(n+m+1)/2; N = n+m+1
wehave that O(n,m+1) = Iso(adS(n,m)), Ads space is maximally symmetric.

To compute a basis for the lie algebra (in some coord's) use co-ord patch of the embeding of AdS and then compute which vector will be pushed forward to give all lin indep killing vectors in the embedding
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Back
Top