Kinematic Equations: T vs Delta T vs DT

  • Thread starter Thread starter phrygian
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Delta Delta t
AI Thread Summary
Kinematic equations can be expressed using various notations for time and displacement, such as t, delta t, dt for time, and d, delta x, dx for displacement. Each notation serves a distinct purpose: t indicates a specific time point, delta t represents a time interval, and dt refers to an infinitesimally small time change used in calculus. While basic kinematic problems often utilize delta t and delta x, more complex scenarios typically require calculus, including the use of dt and dx. A solid understanding of calculus is essential for grasping advanced mechanics, as it provides the necessary tools for solving intricate problems. Ultimately, familiarity with both basic and advanced forms of kinematic equations is crucial for success in physics.
phrygian
Messages
77
Reaction score
0
You see the variables in the kinematic equations expressed as different things sometimes such as t, delta t, dt; or d, delta x, dx; What are all the different forms of the kinematic equations with these different variables? Do you approach certain problems with certain forms or can they all just be used interchangeably for each other?
Thanks for the help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you studied calculus?
t, delta t and dt for example are all related to time (in your example), but they are totally different, obviously.
t is usually a point in the time dimention. t=5, for example, means the point on the "t=5" axis.
delta t usually implies a difference between two time positions. if I have begun moving at t=2, and have finished my movement in t=7, then delta t is 5.
dt is when delta t is taken to be infinitisimally small. This expression is used to develop basic, more general equations in mechanics, using calculus.
Did that answer your question?
 
So is this correct, the calculus is only used to derive the kinematic equations, but in kinematics problems using the kinematic equations you don't use dt or dx you use delta t and delta x?
 
Well, generally, and usually, physics isn't as rigorous and demanding, at least not on high school level and low degrees levels, as mathematics. However, You can't really study mechanics and understand it profoundly if you don't have the tools of calculus.
You can always solve easy problems with basic equations. More complicated problems might involve diffrential equations, for example - but they can also be solved using a "technique", rather than real mathematics. But most problems I encounter on my degree of physics include much use of calculus - not theoratical use but practical one.

delta t and delta x are very common and widly used on high school level as well. "dx" and "dt" are kinda cencored, but as you progress through university and college it becomes difficult to ignore them. There's no way you can study mechanics in a high level of detail without background in calculus.
 
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Scalar and vector potentials in Coulomb gauge Assume Coulomb gauge so that $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A}=0.\tag{1}$$ The scalar potential ##\phi## is described by Poisson's equation $$\nabla^2 \phi = -\frac{\rho}{\varepsilon_0}\tag{2}$$ which has the instantaneous general solution given by $$\phi(\mathbf{r},t)=\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\int \frac{\rho(\mathbf{r}',t)}{|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}'|}d^3r'.\tag{3}$$ In Coulomb gauge the vector potential ##\mathbf{A}## is given by...
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (First part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8 and stuck at some statements. It's little bit confused. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. Solution : The surface bound charge on the ##xy## plane is of opposite sign to ##q##, so the force will be...
Back
Top