Kinematics (rectilnear motion) spring.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the kinematics of a compressed spring, specifically a 14-inch spring compressed to 8 inches, which accelerates an object (black A) with an initial acceleration of 400 ft/sec² that decreases linearly to zero as the spring returns to its original length. Participants explore the correct function for acceleration, with adjustments made to the equation to reflect the spring's behavior. There is confusion regarding the definition of 'x' in the context of displacement, leading to discussions on deriving velocity as a function of position and calculating time to reach a specific position (3 inches). Ultimately, one participant confirms a calculated time of approximately 0.0360 seconds, aligning closely with a reference value of 0.0370 seconds. The thread highlights the complexities of applying kinematic equations in this scenario, particularly in defining variables and integrating to find solutions.
whynot314
Messages
76
Reaction score
0
the 14 in. spring is compressed to an 8 in length, where it is released from rest and accelerates black A. the acceleration has an initial value of 400ft/sec^2 and then decreases linearly with the x-movement of the black, reaching zero when the spring regains its original 14 in. length. calculate the time for the black to go to 3 in.

just wondering If I am on the right track. I believe that is the right function for acceleration of a displacement. I am unsure about initial velocity though. Yes I made the adjustment to a=-240x+3360
[URL=http://s1341.photobucket.com/user/nebula-314/media/20131225_150014_zpsac8609aa.jpg.html][PLAIN]http://i1341.photobucket.com/albums/o745/nebula-314/20131225_150014_zpsac8609aa.jpg[/URL][/PLAIN]
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
How do you get x = -6in. for the compressed length?
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
yea idk I took x to be in the positive direction to the right, thus giving me a negative X.

I want to use the equation of acceleration as a function of position a=f(s). and.

\int^{V}_{V0}vdv=\int^{S}_{s0}f(s)ds

to derive me velocity as function of position then, use that to further drive the equations for time.

I am just having trouble with the initial acceleration function.
 
whynot314 said:
yea idk I took x to be in the positive direction to the right, thus giving me a negative X.

I want to use the equation of acceleration as a function of position a=f(s). and.

\int^{V}_{V0}vdv=\int^{S}_{s0}f(s)ds

to derive me velocity as function of position then, use that to further drive the equations for time.

I am just having trouble with the initial acceleration function.
The spring has a relaxed length of 14 in. When it is compressed to being only 8 in. long, how much has it been compressed by?
Your diagrams on the RHS of the OP are correct, but the graph on the left is wrong. I think you have been inconsistent in what you mean by 'x'. In the lower diagram you have x as the change in length, which starts at 0 and becomes -6. But in the graph you have x changing from 14 to -6.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Ok my new strat, a= \frac{-2400x}{7}+4800
(general integration setup
\int^{V}_{0}vdv=\int^{X}_{0} (\frac{-2400x}{7}+4800)dx

gives me V= \sqrt{\frac{-2400x^2}{7}+9600x }

then, velocity as a function of position.

\int^{t}_{0}dt=\int^{3}_{0}\frac{dx}{ \sqrt{\frac{-2400x^2}{7}+9600x }}


put that into wolfram
gives me .0360 sec, book says .0370 sec
 
Last edited:
This time I used the position of 8 in as x=0, which allows me to generally set up an integration for velocity where initial position is zero. does this look correct?

20131226_150252_zps042894e0.jpg
 
got it guys finally!, Yes you were right haruspex I was having HUGE difficulty as to what was being meant by "X". Thanks for the help haruspex.

[URL=http://s1341.photobucket.com/user/nebula-314/media/20131226_161422_zps90413be0.jpg.html][PLAIN]http://i1341.photobucket.com/albums/o745/nebula-314/20131226_161422_zps90413be0.jpg[/URL][/PLAIN]
 
I confirm the answer. My method is rather different.
We know it will be SHM with an amplitude of 6 in.
Just plug the known facts into find omega, then find the time at x = -3in.:
##x = -6 \cos(\omega t)##
##\ddot x = 6 \omega^2 \cos(\omega t)##
At t = 0:
## 4800 = 6 \omega^2 ##, ##\omega = 20\sqrt 2##
After 3 in. of expansion:
## x = 3 = -6 \cos(\omega t_3)##
## \omega t_3 = \pi/3##
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Yea I saw those equations else where, but I wanted to use the method the book was giving me.
 
Back
Top