Kinetic Energy and Colliding Blocks

AI Thread Summary
A 2.4 kg block with 48 J of kinetic energy collides with a second block at rest, resulting in a combined kinetic energy of 36 J after sticking together. The initial speed of the first block is calculated to be 5.98 m/s. The error in the original calculation stems from incorrectly applying the conservation of kinetic energy instead of the conservation of momentum, as some energy is lost during the inelastic collision. To find the mass of the second block, momentum conservation must be used alongside the calculated velocities. The correct mass of the second block is determined to be 0.80 kg.
mohabitar
Messages
140
Reaction score
0
A 2.4 kg block with a kinetic energy of 48 J slides on a horizontal frictionless table and collides with a second block. The second block is made of a different material and is initially at rest. The two blocks stick together and after the collision have a kinetic energy of 36 J. Find the mass of the second block.

What I did was first find the speed of the first block:
1/2MV^2=48
V[1,i]=5.98
Then the sum of their kinetic energies at the end is just 36. I use that sum to isolate for M[2], and I get .38, which is the incorrect answer. The correct answer is .80 kg. Any idea what I'm doing wrong or what I'm supposed to do? I'm practicing for an exam and this question was one of the old test questions.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Man what happened to this forum..this thing used to actually be helpful
 
Kinetic energy is not conserved (some of the energy is lost to heat when the blocks stick together). You need to use conservation of momentum.

(You can use KE = (1/2)mv2 as a way of finding the velocities, but the rest of the problem is conservation of momentum, not energy.)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top