Kinetic energy from c.o.m frame

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the kinetic energy of a system as observed from different frames of reference, particularly focusing on the center of mass (c.m.) frame and its implications when the frame is rotating. Participants explore the complexities that arise when transitioning from a translational to a rotational frame.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant states that the kinetic energy of a system from a certain frame is the sum of the kinetic energy in the c.m. frame and the kinetic energy of the c.m. itself, questioning if a closed formula exists for a rotating frame.
  • Another participant challenges the clarity of the initial statement and notes that the same result does not apply to rotating frames, suggesting that calculations yield more complicated results.
  • A participant acknowledges the complexity of deriving a formula in a rotating frame and asks if any known results exist.
  • One participant provides a detailed approach to calculating kinetic energies in a rotating frame, introducing effective kinetic energies and expressing them in terms of angular velocity and angular momentum, while also noting uncertainty about the correctness of their calculations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express uncertainty and disagreement regarding the applicability of the initial kinetic energy formulation to rotating frames. No consensus is reached on the existence of a closed formula or the correctness of the proposed calculations.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations in clarity and assumptions regarding the motion of the center of mass and the nature of the rotating frame. The complexity of the resulting equations is acknowledged, but specific mathematical steps remain unresolved.

pardesi
Messages
337
Reaction score
0
we know
kinetic energy of a system from a certain frame of refrence is the sum of kinetic energy in the c.m framee of refrence that moves translationally to the previous frame and the kinetic energy of c.m from that frame.

but what if the i choose the frame attached to the c.m such that it rotaes about a point in the previous frame is there a closed formulae for that
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you know how to prove the first statement you made? (and which you btw. didn't say very clearly)

I'm not sure what kind of answer you are seeking, but at least precisely the same result doesn't work with rotating frames . You can verify this by trying to prove it, and you'll see that the calculations give something more complicated.
 
yes soory for the non clarity(was too bored to write in latex...)
well i tried doing the same way as first but ended up in a much complex formulae...is there any known result
 
I'm not sure about well known results, but it is not difficult to calculate something about this. If we, for simplicity, assume that the center of mass is not moving, then velocities of the particles in rotating frame are

[tex] \dot{x}_k-\omega\times x_k[/tex]

still written with the inertial frame vectors. Omega is the angular velocity of the rotating frame. If correct kinetic energies are

[tex] E_k = \frac{1}{2}m_k |\dot{x}_k|^2[/tex]

and if we define some kind of effective kinetic energies

[tex] E_{k,eff} = \frac{1}{2}m_k |\dot{x}_k- \omega\times x_k|^2[/tex]

then, assuming I calculated this correctly, we have

[tex] E_{k,eff} = E_k + \frac{1}{2}m_k |\omega\times x_k|^2 - \omega\cdot L_k[/tex]

where L is the angular momentum of the particle. Then

[tex] E = \sum_{k=1}^N E_k = E_{eff} - \frac{1}{2}\sum_{k=1}^N m_k |\omega\times x_k|^2 + \omega\cdot L[/tex]

I'm not sure. I was bored, and looking for something small to do. Check the result yourself if you want to know if it's correct.

What ever you were looking for, I believe that the result will involve equations that look something like that.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 88 ·
3
Replies
88
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K