Kinetic energy in frames of reference

AI Thread Summary
When one object accelerates from velocity v to 2v, the kinetic energy (KE) gain differs depending on the frame of reference, even though the work done remains constant. The force applied is the same in both frames, but the distance over which it acts varies, leading to different work calculations. In the moving frame, the relationship between acceleration and distance results in a different KE change compared to the stationary frame. Specifically, the work done in the stationary frame is three times larger, aligning with the change in kinetic energy. This illustrates the importance of considering the frame of reference when analyzing kinetic energy and work.
daveed
Messages
138
Reaction score
0
i was just reading, and i saw this question, and i don't know how to explain it...

how can you describe why when two things go at a velocity v, and one of them accelerates to 2v, the KE gain w/ respect to the Earth and the other object are different, but the work done is constant?

i just don't know how to explain this... it should not be so difficult, no?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
daveed said:
how can you describe why when two things go at a velocity v, and one of them accelerates to 2v, the KE gain w/ respect to the Earth and the other object are different, but the work done is constant?

The work, Fx (assuming constant acceleration), isn't constant. The force is the same in both frames, but the distance isn't.

x=\int v~dt

Moving frame:

v=\int a~dt=at
x=\frac{1}{2}at^2

Stationary frame:

v=v_0+\int a~dt=v_0+at
x=v_0t+\frac{1}{2}at^2

In your example, this leads to work that's three times larger in the stationary frame, just like the change of kinetic energy.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...

Similar threads

Back
Top