Kinetic energy of object free fall

AI Thread Summary
When an object is dropped from height h, its gravitational potential energy is given by E = mgh, while its kinetic energy upon impact is E = (1/2)mv^2. The principle of conservation of energy states that the gravitational energy converts to kinetic energy, leading to the equation E(g) = E(k). The kinetic energy does depend on height, as it is derived from the potential energy, which is a function of h. The relationship between the two energies shows that the speed of the object upon hitting the ground is v = √(2gh).
bay
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
If an object is dropped from height, h, then gravitational energy is E = mgh, but kinetic energy when object hits the ground is E=(1/2)mv^2. Conservation of energy states that E(g)=E(k). Why does kinetic energy not depend on height object was dropped?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It does! Its equal to mgh which is a function of h!
 
Shyan said:
It does! Its equal to mgh which is a function of h!
How does the h cancel out?
 
bay said:
How does the h cancel out?
It doesn't. ## E_k=\frac 1 2 m v^2 ## is the definition of kinetic energy of a particle with mass m and speed v regardless of what forces are applied to it. Any particle with mass m and speed v, has the kinetic energy ## E_k ##. Now if this particle acquired its kinetic energy by falling from a height h under constant gravitational acceleration g, then the numerical value of ## mgh ## and ## \frac 1 2 m v^2 ## will be equal which means the speed of the particle is ## v=\sqrt{2gh} ##.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top