Kinetic theory and gas molecules

AI Thread Summary
The kinetic theory explains that gas molecules move rapidly and collide with each other and container walls, exerting significant force due to their small area. Despite this, gas molecules do not escape or drill holes in the container because their mass is relatively low, and the area they occupy is minimal compared to their force. Pressure, defined as force per area, is a macroscopic concept that does not effectively describe atomic-level interactions. The discrepancy arises from the scaling differences between area and mass, with area increasing with the square of length and mass with the cube. Understanding these principles clarifies why gas behavior does not align with initial expectations of high pressure leading to escape.
adjacent
Gold Member
Messages
1,552
Reaction score
62
The kinetic theory states that the gas molecules are randomly colliding with each other and with the wall of the container with high speed.The area of each molecule is very less and as they are moving with high speed,they exert great force. since the pressure is force/area , the pressure should be very high and each gas molecules should be able to drill holes and escape.
But this doesn't happen.Why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
adjacent said:
The area of each molecule is very less ...
Their mass is much more less. Area scales with length2, mass with length3.

since the pressure is force/area
Pressure is a macroscopic concept, which is not useful for atomic level interactions.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top