Kinetics: Defining Temperatures for Molecular Energy Storage Modes

  • Thread starter Thread starter engineer23
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Kinetics
AI Thread Summary
Defining temperatures for molecular energy storage modes—translational, rotational, and vibrational—requires the populations of these states to follow a Boltzmann distribution. This is typically valid when the modes are decoupled, which is uncommon, but one can still discuss rotational temperatures within specific vibrational states. For example, in the reaction H + Cl2 producing HCl, the internal energy cannot be simply separated into translational and rotational components due to their coupling. The vibrational temperature can be defined by analyzing the population distribution of HCl across vibrational states, while rotational temperatures may vary for each vibrational state. The timing of measurements post-collision significantly affects the results, as rotational distributions reach equilibrium faster than vibrational ones.
engineer23
Messages
68
Reaction score
0
When can you define temperatures for the molecular energy storage modes (i.e. translational, rotational, vibrational)? I have seen the graphs of this where translational modes are at room temperature and then as temperature increases, the rotational and later vibrational modes are "activated." What assumptions are inherent in this sort of analysis (ideal gas? relationships between Cv and Cp?)...

Thanks for any insight into this! I am starting a course on combustion and am trying to familiarize myself with some background on gas dynamics, etc.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
engineer23 said:
When can you define temperatures for the molecular energy storage modes (i.e. translational, rotational, vibrational)?
Roughly speaking, you can do this when the populations of the individual states can be characterised by a Boltzmann distribution, since the parameter temperature determines the whole distribution of populations over the states. Also, if you speak, for example, of a rotational temperature, then it is necessary, strictly speaking, that the rotational mode be decoupled from the other modes. This is rarely the case but you could still speak of the
rotational temperature of all the molecules in a particular vibrational mode. Confusing? Let me give a real example:

Consider the reaction H + Cl2 producing HCl(v,J) + Cl. The heat of reaction ends up in the translation of the products (i.e. kinetic energy) and in the internal energy of the the rovibrational states of HCl characterised by the vibrational quantum number v and the rotational quantum number J. The internal energy of a particular state (v,J) CANNOT
be written as E(v) + E(J) because of the coupling between the rotational and vibrational modes. It is, however, still useful to talk of a vibrational temperature by considering the distribution of the populations HCl(v,*), where I mean that for a given v, you sum over the populations of all the rotational states, assigning an average energy to HCl(v,*); it could be that the distribution of populations of HCl(v.*) over all v might be able to be simulated by a Boltzmann distribution characterised by some temperature Tv, which would then by called the vibrational temperature. Similarly, you can find the populations over J for all states belonging to a particular v, and this might be able to be simulated by a Boltzmann distribution characterised by a rotational temperature. Note that there could be a different rotational temperature for each v. Also, if you do this experiment in the laboratory, the results will depend strongly on how long after the collision process the measurements are taken: rotational distributions "relax" toward their equilibrium distributions much more quickly than the vibrational distributions. This is because vibrational energy transfer on collision is much less efficient than that of rotation and translation.

This is all a bit vague and fraught with "ifs" and "buts" but I hope it is of some help.
If you wish to read more about such experiments, just google "J.C. Polanyi" for his work on the above reaction and others.
 
Last edited:
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top