Kirchoff voltage law to transistor circuits?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The original poster seeks to derive equations for the base-emitter and collector-emitter sides of a transistor circuit using Kirchhoff's voltage law. The context involves understanding how to apply this law in the analysis of transistor circuits, particularly with a voltage divider bias configuration for an NPN transistor.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of Kirchhoff's voltage law, with the original poster attempting to establish a loop equation for the base-emitter side. Questions arise regarding the current direction and the assumptions about known and unknown values in the circuit.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the correct application of Kirchhoff's voltage law, with some participants providing guidance on the importance of current direction and the need for clarity on given values in the circuit. Multiple interpretations of the current flow and voltage relationships are being examined.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the potential discrepancy in current direction as defined in the original poster's diagram and the implications for applying Kirchhoff's law. There is also mention of practical considerations regarding the base current in relation to the bias resistors.

logearav
Messages
329
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I want to know how to arrive at the equation for the base emitter side and collector emitter side of a transistor using kirchhoff voltage law.


Homework Equations


Kirchoff voltage law is \sumV = \sum IR.
Please refer my attachment in which i have to arrive an equation for base emitter side. So starting from the point O i proceed in the direction given in red arrows which gives
IERE+I1R2 = -VBE
Am i correct? Similarly help is needed to arrive the same to the collector emitter side.


The Attempt at a Solution




 

Attachments

  • IMG1_0001.jpg
    IMG1_0001.jpg
    5.5 KB · Views: 851
Physics news on Phys.org
Since the base is drawing some (small) current, the voltage at the base will not be precisely the value given by a simple voltage divider action of the the base bias resistors R1 and R2. If R1 and R2 happen to be relatively small in value and they carry a current between Vcc and ground that is much greater than the base current, then the approximation may be adequate. Usually this is not the case (in a practical circuit it would be a wast of power).

You might want to look for a simple equivalent circuit model with which to replace the transistor in the circuit so that you can write the loop equations. Maybe something like this:

attachment.php?attachmentid=37993&stc=1&d=1313333193.gif


[Image source: http://people.seas.harvard.edu/~jones/es154/lectures/lecture_3/bjt_models/bjt_models.html ]
 

Attachments

  • Fig1.gif
    Fig1.gif
    12.5 KB · Views: 2,485
From the diagram it appears I1 is defined as flowing downward, yet your (red arrows) loop defines it flowing upward. So you need to change its sign.

Secondly, you did not make clear what values are given and what are unknown. From your text it is clear that Vbe is unknown, but what about the other symbols on the diagram? Are we to assume all other symbols on the diagram are given?
 
Mr. fleem, the arrow mark in the red is the direction i proceed in a closed loop for arriving the kirchhoff voltage law.
This is a voltage divider bias used in npn transistor.
 
logearav said:
Mr. fleem, the arrow mark in the red is the direction i proceed in a closed loop for arriving the kirchhoff voltage law.
This is a voltage divider bias used in npn transistor.

Yes, but I'm just saying be careful to keep track of the sign of the current. Since the red arrows point opposite the direction of the current defined in the diagram, so (assuming) you've been given the value for that current in the diagram, you must change its sign to match the definition used by the red arrows.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K