Klein-Gordon Hamiltonian commutator

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the computation of the commutator between the Klein-Gordon Hamiltonian ##H## and a polynomial function ##F## of the fields ##\Phi## and ##\Pi##. The correct relationship is established as ##[H,F] = -i \partial_0 F##, which is derived using the commutation relations ##[\Phi(t,\mathbf{x}),\Pi(t,\mathbf{y})]=i\delta^{(3)}(\mathbf{x}-\mathbf{y})## and the Hamiltonian expressed as ##H=\frac{1}{2} \int d^3\mathbf{x}(\Pi^2 + (\nabla \Phi)^2 + m^2 \Phi^2)##. The participants emphasize the importance of correctly applying integration by parts and the fundamental commutation relations to arrive at the solution.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics and Hamiltonian mechanics
  • Familiarity with the Klein-Gordon equation and its associated fields
  • Knowledge of commutation relations in quantum field theory
  • Proficiency in calculus, particularly integration by parts
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Klein-Gordon Hamiltonian in detail
  • Learn about the implications of commutation relations in quantum field theory
  • Explore the concept of time evolution in quantum mechanics using the Heisenberg picture
  • Investigate the role of polynomials in quantum field theory and their commutation properties
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, graduate students in theoretical physics, and anyone studying quantum field theory who seeks to deepen their understanding of Hamiltonian dynamics and commutation relations.

loops496
Messages
24
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


Consider the quantum mechanical Hamiltonian ##H##. Using the commutation relations of the fields and conjugate momenta , show that if ##F## is a polynomial of the fields##\Phi## and ##\Pi## then
##[H,F]-i \partial_0 F##

Homework Equations


For KG we have:
##H=\frac{1}{2} \int d^3\mathbf{x}(\Pi^2 + (\nabla \Phi)^2 + m^2 \Phi^2)##
##\Phi(x) = \int \frac{d^3 \mathbf{p}}{(2\pi)^3 \sqrt{2E_{\mathbf{p}}}}(a_{\mathbf{p}} e^{-ipx} + a_{\mathbf{p}}^\dagger e^{ipx} )##
##\Pi(x) = \int \frac{-i d^3 \mathbf{p}}{(2\pi)^3 }\sqrt{\frac{2E_{\mathbf{p}}}{2}}(a_{\mathbf{p}} e^{-ipx} + a_{\mathbf{p}}^\dagger e^{ipx} )##
##[\Phi(t,\mathbf{x}),\Pi(t,\mathbf{y})]=i\delta^{(3)}(\mathbf{x}-\mathbf{y})##​

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
I have written ##F## as a generic two variable polynomial in ##\Phi,\;\Pi## but I don't know how to tackle that commutator, any help or hint is appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Start by looking at your problem statement. It sure looks like you have it typed in incorrectly, since there is no equals sign in it. What is it you are meant to be showing? The text ends with the word "then" so one would expect to have to show something equals something else.

Heh. It's funny that the forum's spell checker does not know the word commutator. It keeps trying to change it to commenter.

So you have the commutator of phi with pi. And you have the Hamiltonian in terms of phi and pi. So you should be able to work out [H,F]. You just remember your rules for integrals and "integration by parts" and things of that nature.

And then the only difficult part is relating that commutator to the time derivative you have. Assuming there is an equals sign in there some place. For that you are going to need just a little bit more information. For example, what is [H,phi]? And what is [H,pi]? Or, to put it another way, how can you get the time derivative of phi and pi?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: loops496
Yes you're totally right I missed an equals sign! It should be
##[H,F]=-i \partial_o F##​
 
Last edited:
First, can you compute ##[H,\Phi(\vec y,t)]##?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: loops496
Yes indeed I can Avodyne, actually after some work using both commutators with the Hamiltonian I managed to prove what the original question asked. Thanks for the hints guys!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K