Ksp and Q precipitate, Why does volume of water matter

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the importance of including the volume of water when calculating the solubility product constant (Ksp) and the reaction quotient (Q) for precipitate formation, specifically for AgCl. Although AgCl has low solubility, it is not completely insoluble, and its Ksp indicates that even minimal concentrations of Ag+ and Cl- ions can lead to precipitation under certain conditions. The final equilibrium state is influenced by the total volume of the solution, as this affects the concentrations of the ions involved. If the concentrations are too low due to excessive water, precipitate formation may not occur, despite the potential for it. Therefore, the volume of water is crucial in determining whether a precipitate will form in the reaction.
AMan24
Messages
58
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


3VodkT3.png


Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
So here's my question again, why do you need to include 40L of water in the total volume? It's not like AgCl is going to dissolve in water right? AgCl has low solubility in water. I mean if it was like NaCl then you should include the water because it dissolved, but if it was something that isn't soluble in water at all, then why would you include the water?

Lets say you did a reaction like this and it formed something that isn't solube in water at all, if you include the water in the math, the math will say no precipitate formed, but in reality there will be a precipitate formed.

So for this reaction i'd say a precipitate will form but a small part of it would be dissolved
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is Q that defines what will precipitate and what will not. To calculate Q you need concentrations. How are you going to calculate concentrations without taking the final volume into account?
 
Does it have anything to do with water being added in the beginning? So a precipitate never forms in the first place because the concentrations are too low, if it is then i guess i kind of understand it
 
Why would the situation be different if the water was added later? Why do you think AgCl would not dissolve? It may have low solubility, but it still follows Ksp. Plus, the final equilibrium doesn't depend on the path followed to get to the final state. It sometimes does, when reactions are irreversible, but that's not the case here.
 
what is Ksp of AgCl ?
it is the ionic product of [Ag+ ] and [Cl-] .These are the concentration of ions in solution and solution means solute (AgCl) and solvent( water here).It is not that AgCl is completely insoluble, its very low Ksp indicates that it is very less soluble.It means volume of water added do matter in precipitation of AgCl and cases will be there where Q<Ksp just because of excess water...like in your problem.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top