MHB Λ and μ are scalars, find the value of λ and the value of μ

  • Thread starter Thread starter Help seeker
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Scalars Value
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a geometric problem involving a rectangle OABC, where specific points and ratios are defined. Part (a) requires finding CF in terms of a and AD in terms of c, which can be determined using the given ratios. In part (b), the intersection of lines OD and AF is analyzed to find the scalars λ and μ, with calculations leading to the coordinates of point X. Part (c) involves determining the ratio OX : XD, which is derived from the intersection results. Finally, part (d) calculates the area of quadrilateral XDBF based on the previously established geometric relationships.
Help seeker
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
ScreenShot_20210317094458.png
Figure shows a rectangle OABC in which OA = a and OC = c. F is the midpoint of CB and D is the point on AB such that AD : DB = 2:3
(a) Find
_ _ _ _ _ __ (i) CF in terms of a
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (ii) AD in terms of c

The lines OD and AF intersect at the point X Given that
OX = λOD and AX = μAF, where λ and μ are scalars,

(b) find the value of λ and the value of μ

Given that OX : XD = n:1

(c) find the value of n

Given also that I a l = 12 cm and l c I = 12.5 cm,

(d) find the area, in cm2, of quadrilateral XDBF .
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
D
skeeter said:
part (a) is straightforward ... you should be able to use the given ratios to determine CF and AD in terms of a and c respectively.

part (b) ... let O be the origin, (0,0), of a Cartesian grid, A = (a,0), F = (a/2,c), etc.

OD has slope $\dfrac{|AD|}{a} \implies \text{ segment OD has equation } y = \dfrac{|AD|}{a} \cdot x$, where |AD| is in terms of c found in part (a)

AF has slope $-\dfrac{2c}{a} \implies \text{ segment AF has equation } y = -\dfrac{2c}{a} (x - a)$

using the two linear equations, determine the intersection, which will allow you to determine the values of $\lambda$ & $\mu$

part (c) should be easy to determine from the intersection information in working part (b)

part (d) ... area of XDBF = area of ABCO - CFAO - ADX
Don't leave it half-way
Plz complete it.
 
I would set up a coordinate system so that O is at the origin, A is at (a, 0), and C is at (0, c). Then B is at (a, c).
F is at (a/2, c) so the line from A to F is y= -(2c/a)(x- a)= -(2c/a)x+ 2c. D is the point on AB such that AD : DB = 2:3 so if we take D to be (a, x), AD= c- x and DB= x. That is, AD/DB=x/(c- x)= 2/3. 3x=2(c- x)= 2c- 2x. 5x= 2c so x= (2/5)c. D is at (a, (2/5)c). The line from O to D is y= ((2/5)c/a)x. X is the intersection of the two lines so y= -(2c/a)x+ 2c= ((2/5)c/a)x. 2c= ((2/5+ 2)(c/a)x= (12/5)(c/a)x. x= (5/12)(a/c)(2c)= (5/6)a.
y= (2/5)(c/a)(5/6)a= c/3.

X is the point ((5/6)a, c/3).https://mathhelpboards.com/account/

OX= sqrt((25/36)a^2+ c^2/9)= sqrt{25a^2/36+ 4c^2/36}= sqrt(25a^2+ 4c^2)/6.
OD= sqrt(a^2+ 4c^2/25)= sqrt(25a^2+4c^2)/5.

AX= sqrt(a^2/36+ c^2/9)= sqrt((a^2/36+ 4c^2/36)= sqrt(a^2+ 4c^2)/6.
AF= sqrt(a^2/4+ c^2)= sqrt(a^2+ 4a)/2.
 
Country Boy said:
I would set up a coordinate system so that O is at the origin, A is at (a, 0), and C is at (0, c). Then B is at (a, c).
F is at (a/2, c) so the line from A to F is y= -(2c/a)(x- a)= -(2c/a)x+ 2c. D is the point on AB such that AD : DB = 2:3 so if we take D to be (a, x), AD= c- x and DB= x. That is, AD/DB=x/(c- x)= 2/3. 3x=2(c- x)= 2c- 2x. 5x= 2c so x= (2/5)c. D is at (a, (2/5)c). The line from O to D is y= ((2/5)c/a)x. X is the intersection of the two lines so y= -(2c/a)x+ 2c= ((2/5)c/a)x. 2c= ((2/5+ 2)(c/a)x= (12/5)(c/a)x. x= (5/12)(a/c)(2c)= (5/6)a.
y= (2/5)(c/a)(5/6)a= c/3.

X is the point ((5/6)a, c/3).https://mathhelpboards.com/account/

OX= sqrt((25/36)a^2+ c^2/9)= sqrt{25a^2/36+ 4c^2/36}= sqrt(25a^2+ 4c^2)/6.
OD= sqrt(a^2+ 4c^2/25)= sqrt(25a^2+4c^2)/5.

AX= sqrt(a^2/36+ c^2/9)= sqrt((a^2/36+ 4c^2/36)= sqrt(a^2+ 4c^2)/6.
AF= sqrt(a^2/4+ c^2)= sqrt(a^2+ 4a)/2.
Tnx
 
Tnx
Solved
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top