Ladder problem, no equation to use for dy/dt

  • Thread starter Thread starter Slimsta
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a related rates problem involving a ladder sliding down a wall. The context includes the relationship between the lengths of the sides of a right triangle formed by the ladder, the wall, and the ground, with a focus on differentiating to find rates of change.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of the chain rule and implicit differentiation to relate the rates of change of the ladder's position. Some question the initial conditions of the ladder's position and how it affects the rates. Others explore the implications of the Pythagorean theorem in the context of the problem.

Discussion Status

There is ongoing exploration of different methods to approach the problem, including implicit differentiation and the application of the Pythagorean theorem. Some participants have provided guidance on differentiating the relevant equations, while others are clarifying assumptions about the ladder's initial position and its impact on the rates of change.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential issues with the problem's setup, such as the starting position of the ladder and whether it is fully vertical. There is also mention of the constant rate at which the bottom of the ladder slides, which some argue should not affect the outcome.

Slimsta
Messages
189
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


http://img132.imageshack.us/img132/8048/prob2r.jpg


Homework Equations


dy/dt = dx/dt * dy/dx


The Attempt at a Solution


would dy/dx = 0? because the ladder is 11 m, the derivative of 11 is 0..
and then would dy/dt be the rate of the top of the ladder sliding down?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
you need to find y in terms of x first, thinking about triangles

then use your chain rule
 
You know that [tex]\frac{dy}{dt}[/tex] is equal to [tex]\frac{dy}{dx}*\frac{dx}{dt}[/tex]

You know [tex]\frac{dx}{dt}[/tex] is 3. So all that's left to do is solve for [tex]\frac{dy}{dx}[/tex]

By the pythagorean theorem, [tex]a^2+b^2=c^2[/tex]. In this case, on the y-axis you have your a, on the x-axis you have your b and the hypotenuse you have c.

Therefore, [tex]y^2+x^2=c^2[/tex], so [tex]y=\sqrt{c^2-x^2}[/tex]. Differentiate with respect to x.

[tex]\frac{dy}{dx}=-x/\sqrt(121-x^2)[/tex]

Substitute 8.316 for x, and solve for [tex]\frac{dy}{dx}[/tex]
 
alecst said:
You know that [tex]\frac{dy}{dt}[/tex] is equal to [tex]\frac{dy}{dx}*\frac{dx}{dt}[/tex]

You know [tex]\frac{dx}{dt}[/tex] is 3. So all that's left to do is solve for [tex]\frac{dy}{dx}[/tex]

By the pythagorean theorem, [tex]a^2+b^2=c^2[/tex]. In this case, on the y-axis you have your a, on the x-axis you have your b and the hypotenuse you have c.

Therefore, [tex]y^2+x^2=c^2[/tex], so [tex]y=\sqrt{c^2-x^2}[/tex]. Differentiate with respect to x.

[tex]\frac{dy}{dx}=-x/\sqrt(121-x^2)[/tex]

Substitute 8.316 for x, and solve for [tex]\frac{dy}{dx}[/tex]

for [tex]\frac{dy}{dx}=-x/\sqrt(121-x^2)[/tex] of [tex]y=\sqrt{c^2-x^2}[/tex]
wouldnt it be first (c-x)/(sqrt(c^2-x^2)) then plug in numbers?
here is what i got so far:
http://img94.imageshack.us/img94/8545/prob2o.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
might be even easier to use implict differntiation wrt x on the following equation
[tex]x^2+y^2=c^2[/tex]

note c is constant and y = y(x)
 
there's a problem in this problem: What is the starting position of the ladder? Is it initially fully vertical? If it is, what makes it slide down?
 
lanedance said:
might be even easier to use implict differntiation wrt x on the following equation
[tex]x^2+y^2=c^2[/tex]

note c is constant and y = y(x)

so you are saying that in the picture that i uploaded, the only thing that is wrong is where i wrote [tex]x^2+y^2=11^2[/tex] instead of [tex]x^2+y^2=c^2[/tex]?
everything else is good?
 
no c = 11 as you said but i was suggesting to try implicit differntiation on the initial equation, though the way you have looked at it is fine
 
blake knight said:
there's a problem in this problem: What is the starting position of the ladder? Is it initially fully vertical? If it is, what makes it slide down?

this is a related rates problem, the speed & ladder position are given, so those questions are irrelevant
 
  • #10
I maybe wrong with my assumption lanedance but I think there is a difference in speed as the top of the ladder approaches 7.2' if it starts from 10' or if it starts from 7.3', visualize the scenario.
 
  • #11
the way I read it, the problem states the bottom of the ladder slides at a constant rate, so the initial position has no impact
 
  • #12
lanedance said:
the way I read it, the problem states the bottom of the ladder slides at a constant rate, so the initial position has no impact

well, i did everything you mentioned already..
and i get dy/dt = 3.464
so what am i doing wrong?
 
  • #13
[tex]x^2 + y^2 = 11^2[/tex]
y = 7
[tex]x = \sqrt{11^2-7^2} = \sqrt{72} = \sqrt{2.2^2 3^2} = 6.\sqrt{2}[/tex]
x' = 3
differentiate wrt t
[tex]2xx' + 2yy' = 0[/tex]
rearrange for y'
[tex]y' = -xx'/y = -(6\sqrt{2})(3)/7[/tex]

think you just missed the negative
 
  • #14
lanedance said:
[tex]x^2 + y^2 = 11^2[/tex]
y = 7
[tex]x = \sqrt{11^2-7^2} = \sqrt{72} = \sqrt{2.2^2 3^2} = 6.\sqrt{2}[/tex]
x' = 3
differentiate wrt t
[tex]2xx' + 2yy' = 0[/tex]
rearrange for y'
[tex]y' = -xx'/y = -(6\sqrt{2})(3)/7[/tex]

think you just missed the negative

well it was negative at first for both the rate change and for dy/dt but then the system say it should be positive...
yeah that works.. i thought they both supposed to be the same answer.
thanks for help! that makes sense now!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
48
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K