Lagrange and Hamiltonian question

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a particle of mass m moving in a plane under the influence of a Newtonian gravitational force, represented by a potential function. The original poster seeks to understand how to introduce a new variable related to the inverse of the radius and derive an equation for the orbit in polar coordinates.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss starting points such as writing the Lagrangian in polar coordinates and considering the Hamiltonian. There are questions about the potential energy in an inverse-square force field and how to handle the new variable introduced in the problem. Some participants express confusion about the implications of changing variables and the relationships between r and u.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants offering various approaches and expressing confusion about the problem setup. Some guidance is provided regarding the use of Lagrangian mechanics and the transformation to polar coordinates, but there is no explicit consensus on the best method to proceed.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the challenges of dealing with the new variable and the implications for the equations of motion. There is a mention of the need to reference mechanics textbooks for further clarification on the topic.

yukcream
Messages
59
Reaction score
0
I can't understand what the question is asking~ hope somebody can help me~
A particle of mass m moves in a plane under the influence of Newtonian gravitation force, described by the potential V(r) = - GmM/r (symbol in conventional meaning)

Now introduce a new variable u(theta) = 1/r(theta) and obtain an equation satisfied by u. Find the equation of the orbit in polar coordinates. What are the allowed trajectories of the particle?

yukyuk
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, I guess the easiest way to go about figuring it out would be to start out by writing the lagrangian, but in polar cooridinates (kinetic energy, potential energy parameterized by radius, theta). Once you have done this, you should be able to see where it goes. Of course you could also write down the Hamiltonian as well and go from there. Pay attention to what happens to the kinetic energy term when you change momentum in cartesian coordinates to polar coordinates.
 
A particle in an inverse-square force field~ what will be the potential then?
yukyuk
 
Since force is the (negative) gradient of the potential energy, what is the
integral of 1/r2?
 
See Goldstein's Classical mechanics, or any text that deals with orbits from a central force. Going to 1/r is a trick that has been used for many years. With 1/r as the variable, Newton's 2nd Law gives a straightforward differential equation. Google porbably will lead you to what you want.

Regards,
Reilly Atkinson
 
O~~ please help me! :cry:
I don't know how to deal with the new variable! Does the question want me to replace all the r in the original Lagrange equation by u or use u to write out another Lagrange equation??

also in the polar coordinate given in the case, r and theta are functions of t, then does it mean that
dr/dt now become -1/u^-2 (theta). d(theta)/dt,as r=1/u~~~

so confusing :frown:

yukyuk
 
Additionally, you may want to write the derivative with respect to time in the final differential equation (containing r's and theta's) as:

\frac{d}{dt} = \frac{d\theta}{dt} \cdot \frac{d}{d\theta}

Nothing more than a chain rule here. However, you're probably going to glean a lot of information from looking at a mechanics textbook.
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
924
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
935
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K