Lagrange Identity Sum Notation

Click For Summary
The discussion clarifies the interpretation of the sum notation in Lagrange's Identity, specifically focusing on the double sum involving indices k and j. It confirms that the notation represents a sum of squared differences for pairs (k, j) where k is less than j, effectively summing over the upper triangle of an n x n grid. Participants highlight the importance of visualizing these index pairs to understand the summation better. The explanation emphasizes that this approach aids in grasping the concept of the sum more intuitively. Overall, the conversation enhances comprehension of the mathematical notation used in Lagrange's Identity.
cloud18
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hi, how do I interpret the last sum:
http://planetmath.org/encyclopedia/LagrangesIdentity.html

Sum (...)
1<=k < j <= n

Is it the double sum:

Sum( Sum( (a_k*b_j - a_j*b_k)^2 from k = 1 to n) from j = 2 to n ) ?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
In your notation it would be:

Sum( Sum( (a_k*b_j - a_j*b_k)^2 from k = 1 to j-1) from j = 2 to n )

as it's a sum of pairs (k,j) from {1,...,n}x{1,...,n} where k is strictly less than j.

If you arrange the pairs of {1,...,n}x{1,...,n} in an nxn grid with k indexing the rows and j the columns like so:

(1,1), (1,2), (1,3),...
(2,1), (2,2), (2,3),...
...

your sum is over the terms above the main diagonal, e.g. for n=3 it's the bold terms:

(1,1), (1,2), (1,3)
(2,1), (2,2), (2,3)
(3,1), (3,2), (3,3)
 
I like to think of it as the sum over all vectors (k,i) where k and i can take any value btw 1 and n, BUT we consider only case vectors for which k<i.
 
Thanks, I see what the notation means, and your way of visualizing the index pairs of the terms being summed was very helpful too, as I never thought to think about it like that.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K