Lagrange Multiplier question with solid attempt

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on applying the method of Lagrange multipliers to find the maximum and minimum values of the function f(x, y) = x + y², subject to the constraint g(x, y) = 2x² + y² - 1. The initial attempt involved setting up the equations ∇f = λ∇g, leading to the equations 1 - λ(4x) = 0 and 2y - λ = 0. The correct approach revealed that λ = 1 is one solution, and further analysis showed that x = 1 or y = 0 are potential solutions, clarifying the constraint should be g(x, y) = 2x² + y² = 1.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lagrange multipliers
  • Familiarity with partial derivatives
  • Knowledge of constraints in optimization problems
  • Basic algebra for solving equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the method of Lagrange multipliers in detail
  • Learn how to derive and solve partial derivatives
  • Explore optimization problems with multiple constraints
  • Investigate the geometric interpretation of Lagrange multipliers
USEFUL FOR

Students studying calculus, particularly those focusing on optimization techniques, as well as educators looking for examples of Lagrange multipliers in action.

tamintl
Messages
74
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Use the method of Lagrange multipliers to find the maximum and minimum values of the function

f(x, y) = x + y2

subject to the constraint g(x,y) = 2x2 + y2 - 1


Homework Equations



none

The Attempt at a Solution



We need to find [itex]\nabla[/itex]f = λ[itex]\nabla[/itex]g

Hence,

[itex]\nabla[/itex]fx - λ[itex]\nabla[/itex]gx = 0

Which becomes, 1 - λ(4x) = 0

[itex]\nabla[/itex]fy - λ[itex]\nabla[/itex]gy = 0

Which becomes, 2y - λ = 0

-------------------------

Now we have: x = 1/4λ and y = λ/2

I assume I am right in now subbing x and y into the constraint...

To give us: 2/16λ2 + λ2/4 - 1 = 0


It seems a bit messy considering this is an elementary part of my homework? Have I gone wrong somewhere?

Regards as always
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your [itex]\partial{L}/\partial{y}[/itex] is incorrect; try again.

RGV
 
Ray Vickson said:
Your [itex]\partial{L}/\partial{y}[/itex] is incorrect; try again.

RGV

Wow, rookie error..

yep dL/dy = 2y - λ(2y)
so λ = 1

Thus, x=1/4

Put this into constraint to get: y=7/8

So (1/4,7/8) is a point..

How do i find the maximum and minimum? thanks
 
the equation 2y = lambda*(2y) has TWO solutions: lambda = 1 is one of them. Can you see another?

RGV
 
Since specific values of [itex]\lambda[/itex] are not part of the "solution" of problems like these, I find it is often a good step to start by dividing one equation by another, eliminating [itex]\lambda[/itex] at the start. Here, your equations are [itex]1= 4\lambda x[/itex] and [itex]2y= 2\lambda y[/i2tex]. Dividing the second equation by the first:<br /> [tex]\frac{2y}{1}= \frac{2\lambda y}{\lambda x}= \frac{2y}{x}[/tex]<br /> which reduces to x= 1 or y= 0.<br /> <br /> However, you say your constraint is "[itex]g(x,y)= 2x^2+ y^2- 1[/itex]" which is not a constraint at all. Did you mean [itex]g(x,y)= 2x^2+ y^2= 1[/itex]? If so, set x= 1 in that and solve for y, then set y= 0 and solve for x.[/itex]
 
The statement that "specific values of lambda are not part of the solution ..." is either misleading or wrong, depending on exactly how you meant it. ONE of the max or min points IS obtained by looking at lambda = 1 and seeing the consequences.

RGV
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K