Lagrange Multipliers - unknown values

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving a problem using Lagrange Multipliers to find the maximum and minimum values of the function f(x,y,z) = x^2 - 2y + 2z^2 under the constraint x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = 1. The participants clarify the steps to derive the values of x, y, and z, particularly how to handle the case where λ (lambda) equals 2, leading to y = -1/2 and z = ±√(3)/2. The solution involves equating gradients and applying the constraint effectively to find all critical points.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lagrange Multipliers
  • Familiarity with gradient vectors
  • Knowledge of multivariable calculus
  • Ability to solve quadratic equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Lagrange Multipliers in optimization problems
  • Learn how to compute gradients for multivariable functions
  • Explore constraints in optimization and their implications
  • Practice solving similar problems involving Lagrange Multipliers
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in calculus, mathematicians focusing on optimization techniques, and anyone looking to deepen their understanding of Lagrange Multipliers in multivariable calculus.

maks4
Messages
36
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Using Lagrange Multipliers, we are to find the maximum and minimum values of f(x,y) subject to the given constraint


Homework Equations


f(x,y,z) = x^2 - 2y + 2z^2, constraint: x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = 1

The Attempt at a Solution


grad f = lambda*grad g
(2x, -2, 4z) = lambda(2x, 2y, 2z)
therefore: 2x = lambda2x
-2 = lambda2y
4z = lambda2z

Now i can see how x and z can both equal 0, and how lambda can equal 1, and how y eventually equals -1 and f(0,-1,0)=2, yet in the solutions there is another part to it where it says
OR, Lambda = 2, y = -1/2, x = 0, z= +- sqrt(3)/2. <---i do not have any idea how these values came to be, no idea at all. Any help would be appreciated, thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If

4z = 2z \lambda then you get that either z=0, or if z is non-zero, it must be lambda=2. Then you just work from there - y comes easily next, followed up by x, and then using the constraint to solve for what z actually is
 
^^I see it now then, thank you.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K