A Lagrange with Higher Derivatives (Ostrogradsky instability)

Click For Summary
In systems described by a Lagrangian that includes higher derivatives like ##\ddot{q_i}##, energy can become unbounded from below, leading to instability. The discussion explores whether energy conservation applies in these scenarios, suggesting that a conservation law may arise from time shift invariance. The derived energy integral indicates that instability is linked to a term involving ##\dddot{q}##. The Abraham-Lorentz-Dirac equation exemplifies these issues, highlighting problems with causality and runaway solutions. Ultimately, despite the instability, energy conservation remains applicable in these systems.
Arman777
Insights Author
Gold Member
Messages
2,163
Reaction score
191
In class our teacher told us that, if a Lagrangian contain ##\ddot{q_i}## (i.e., ##L(q_i, \dot{q_i}, \ddot{q_i}, t)##) the energy will be unbounded from below and it can take any lower values (in other words be unstable). In this type of systems can we show that the energy is conserved ? Or in such system does energy conservation is applicable ?
 
  • Like
Likes PhDeezNutz, vanhees71 and etotheipi
Physics news on Phys.org
there must be some conservation law which follows from the time shift invariance of such systems; I would try to derive it first.

If I did not make an error the "energy" integral is as follows
$$H(q,\dot q,\ddot q,\dddot q)=-L+2\frac{\partial L}{\partial \ddot q}\ddot q+\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot q}\dot q-\frac{d}{dt}\Big(\frac{\partial L}{\partial \ddot q}\dot q\Big)$$
This is under the assumption that ##L## does not depend on t surely.

Instability arises due to the last term I guess. This term is linear in ##\dddot q##
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes dextercioby, Arman777, PhDeezNutz and 2 others
Indeed, the most famous example is the Abraham-Lorentz-Dirac equation for a point particle moving in an external electromagnetic field including the radiation reaction, i.e., the backreaction on the motion of the particle by its own (radiation) field. It leads to serious problems with causality and "run-away solutions".
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes dextercioby, wrobel, Arman777 and 1 other person
So the energy conservation is applicable.
 
Thread 'Why higher speeds need more power if backward force is the same?'
Power = Force v Speed Power of my horse = 104kgx9.81m/s^2 x 0.732m/s = 1HP =746W Force/tension in rope stay the same if horse run at 0.73m/s or at 15m/s, so why then horse need to be more powerfull to pull at higher speed even if backward force at him(rope tension) stay the same? I understand that if I increase weight, it is hrader for horse to pull at higher speed because now is backward force increased, but don't understand why is harder to pull at higher speed if weight(backward force)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K