A Lagrange with Higher Derivatives (Ostrogradsky instability)

AI Thread Summary
In systems described by a Lagrangian that includes higher derivatives like ##\ddot{q_i}##, energy can become unbounded from below, leading to instability. The discussion explores whether energy conservation applies in these scenarios, suggesting that a conservation law may arise from time shift invariance. The derived energy integral indicates that instability is linked to a term involving ##\dddot{q}##. The Abraham-Lorentz-Dirac equation exemplifies these issues, highlighting problems with causality and runaway solutions. Ultimately, despite the instability, energy conservation remains applicable in these systems.
Arman777
Insights Author
Gold Member
Messages
2,163
Reaction score
191
In class our teacher told us that, if a Lagrangian contain ##\ddot{q_i}## (i.e., ##L(q_i, \dot{q_i}, \ddot{q_i}, t)##) the energy will be unbounded from below and it can take any lower values (in other words be unstable). In this type of systems can we show that the energy is conserved ? Or in such system does energy conservation is applicable ?
 
  • Like
Likes PhDeezNutz, vanhees71 and etotheipi
Physics news on Phys.org
there must be some conservation law which follows from the time shift invariance of such systems; I would try to derive it first.

If I did not make an error the "energy" integral is as follows
$$H(q,\dot q,\ddot q,\dddot q)=-L+2\frac{\partial L}{\partial \ddot q}\ddot q+\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot q}\dot q-\frac{d}{dt}\Big(\frac{\partial L}{\partial \ddot q}\dot q\Big)$$
This is under the assumption that ##L## does not depend on t surely.

Instability arises due to the last term I guess. This term is linear in ##\dddot q##
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes dextercioby, Arman777, PhDeezNutz and 2 others
Indeed, the most famous example is the Abraham-Lorentz-Dirac equation for a point particle moving in an external electromagnetic field including the radiation reaction, i.e., the backreaction on the motion of the particle by its own (radiation) field. It leads to serious problems with causality and "run-away solutions".
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes dextercioby, wrobel, Arman777 and 1 other person
So the energy conservation is applicable.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top