A Lagrange with Higher Derivatives (Ostrogradsky instability)

AI Thread Summary
In systems described by a Lagrangian that includes higher derivatives like ##\ddot{q_i}##, energy can become unbounded from below, leading to instability. The discussion explores whether energy conservation applies in these scenarios, suggesting that a conservation law may arise from time shift invariance. The derived energy integral indicates that instability is linked to a term involving ##\dddot{q}##. The Abraham-Lorentz-Dirac equation exemplifies these issues, highlighting problems with causality and runaway solutions. Ultimately, despite the instability, energy conservation remains applicable in these systems.
Arman777
Insights Author
Gold Member
Messages
2,163
Reaction score
191
In class our teacher told us that, if a Lagrangian contain ##\ddot{q_i}## (i.e., ##L(q_i, \dot{q_i}, \ddot{q_i}, t)##) the energy will be unbounded from below and it can take any lower values (in other words be unstable). In this type of systems can we show that the energy is conserved ? Or in such system does energy conservation is applicable ?
 
  • Like
Likes PhDeezNutz, vanhees71 and etotheipi
Physics news on Phys.org
there must be some conservation law which follows from the time shift invariance of such systems; I would try to derive it first.

If I did not make an error the "energy" integral is as follows
$$H(q,\dot q,\ddot q,\dddot q)=-L+2\frac{\partial L}{\partial \ddot q}\ddot q+\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot q}\dot q-\frac{d}{dt}\Big(\frac{\partial L}{\partial \ddot q}\dot q\Big)$$
This is under the assumption that ##L## does not depend on t surely.

Instability arises due to the last term I guess. This term is linear in ##\dddot q##
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes dextercioby, Arman777, PhDeezNutz and 2 others
Indeed, the most famous example is the Abraham-Lorentz-Dirac equation for a point particle moving in an external electromagnetic field including the radiation reaction, i.e., the backreaction on the motion of the particle by its own (radiation) field. It leads to serious problems with causality and "run-away solutions".
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes dextercioby, wrobel, Arman777 and 1 other person
So the energy conservation is applicable.
 
Thread ''splain this hydrostatic paradox in tiny words'
This is (ostensibly) not a trick shot or video*. The scale was balanced before any blue water was added. 550mL of blue water was added to the left side. only 60mL of water needed to be added to the right side to re-balance the scale. Apparently, the scale will balance when the height of the two columns is equal. The left side of the scale only feels the weight of the column above the lower "tail" of the funnel (i.e. 60mL). So where does the weight of the remaining (550-60=) 490mL go...
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Scalar and vector potentials in Coulomb gauge Assume Coulomb gauge so that $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A}=0.\tag{1}$$ The scalar potential ##\phi## is described by Poisson's equation $$\nabla^2 \phi = -\frac{\rho}{\varepsilon_0}\tag{2}$$ which has the instantaneous general solution given by $$\phi(\mathbf{r},t)=\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\int \frac{\rho(\mathbf{r}',t)}{|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}'|}d^3r'.\tag{3}$$ In Coulomb gauge the vector potential ##\mathbf{A}## is given by...
Back
Top