Landau Lifshitz - Total time derivative of the Lagrangian

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the total time derivative of the Lagrangian in classical mechanics as presented in Landau-Lifgarbagez Mechanics. Participants explore the reasoning behind the absence of higher-order derivatives in the expression for the total time derivative of the Lagrangian, focusing on the implications for closed and open systems.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation, Conceptual clarification, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions why the term involving the third derivative of the generalized coordinates is not included in the total time derivative of the Lagrangian.
  • Another participant asserts that the Lagrangian is a function only of generalized coordinates and velocities, suggesting that higher-order derivatives are not relevant in this context.
  • A subsequent reply acknowledges the correctness of the previous assertion regarding the function of the Lagrangian.
  • Another participant introduces the idea that the Lagrangian can depend on time only if the system is open, implying a distinction between closed and open systems.
  • The same participant expresses agreement with this point, reinforcing the discussion on the conditions under which the Lagrangian is defined.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the nature of the Lagrangian as a function of generalized coordinates and velocities, but there is some contention regarding the implications for closed versus open systems and the relevance of higher-order derivatives.

Contextual Notes

The discussion does not resolve the implications of higher-order derivatives in the context of the Lagrangian, nor does it clarify the conditions under which the Lagrangian may depend on time.

omoplata
Messages
327
Reaction score
2
On page 13 in Landau-Lifgarbagez Mechanics, the total time time derivative of the Lagrangian of a closed system is given to be,

\frac{d L}{d t} = \sum_i \frac{\partial L}{\partial q_i} \dot{q_i} + \sum_i \frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{q_i}} \ddot{q_i}

Why does this stop here? I mean, why is the term \sum_i \frac{\partial L}{\partial \ddot{q_i}} \dddot{q_i} not included?

An image of page 13 has been attached.
 

Attachments

  • LandauLifshitz_pg13.jpeg
    LandauLifshitz_pg13.jpeg
    68.4 KB · Views: 784
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Because in classical mechanics the lagrangian is a function only of generalized coordinates and velocities. Read section 1 and 2 of the same book.
 
Thanks for the reply Dickfore. You are correct.
 
It is a function of t only if the system is open.
 
Thanks. Again you are correct.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
399
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K