Unbounded Feasible Region for Lagrange with Two Constraints

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on finding extrema for a function using Lagrange multipliers with two constraints. The user believes they have identified a minimum of 25/3 but is uncertain about determining the maximum. Responses clarify that the function is unbounded and continuous, which means it does not have a maximum. The feasible region allows for points where one variable approaches negative infinity while another approaches positive infinity, leading to the function tending towards positive infinity as well. Understanding the nature of the feasible region is crucial in confirming the absence of a maximum.
Kaura
Messages
122
Reaction score
22

Homework Statement



kuGWwwg.jpg


Homework Equations



Partials for main equation equal the respective partials of the constraints with their multipliers

The Attempt at a Solution



UmkCpuX.jpg


Basically I am checking to see if this is correct
I am pretty sure that 25/3 is the minimum but I am not sure how to find the maximum
The max an min at the bottom can be ignored or replaced with minimum
I have a lot to do today to prepare for midterms so any help would be much appreciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Kaura said:

Homework Statement



kuGWwwg.jpg


Homework Equations



Partials for main equation equal the respective partials of the constraints with their multipliers

The Attempt at a Solution



UmkCpuX.jpg


Basically I am checking to see if this is correct
I am pretty sure that 25/3 is the minimum but I am not sure how to find the maximum
The max an min at the bottom can be ignored or replaced with minimum
I have a lot to do today to prepare for midterms so any help would be much appreciated

Your final solution looks OK, but I did not check the rest because I generally do not look at solutions given as posted images.

You should think about why your solution method does not give you a maximum.
 
Last edited:
So is 25/3 the only extrema and a minimum?
 
Kaura said:
So is 25/3 the only extrema and a minimum?
You tell me. But more importantly, what is the reason?
 
Ray Vickson said:
You tell me. But more importantly, what is the reason?

Yes? because the function is not bound and is continuous?
 
Last edited:
Kaura said:
Yes? because the function is not bound and is continuous?

Right, and because the feasible region (the set of allowed ##(x,y,z)## values) is unbounded. We can find feasible points ##(x,y,z)## with ##x,z \to -\infty,\: y \to +\infty## (and opposite); and of course, ##f \to +\infty## for such points.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K