Lagrange's Four-Square Theorem: 8n-1 Sum of 4 Squares?

  • Thread starter Thread starter karpmage
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Squares Sum
karpmage
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
Lagrange's four-square theorem states that any natural number can be expressed as the sum of four integer squares. I've noticed that the first few values of 8n-1 can all only be expressed as a minimum of the sum of four squares. Is this true for all values of n? What's the proof behind it? Thanks.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
karpmage said:
Lagrange's four-square theorem states that any natural number can be expressed as the sum of four integer squares. I've noticed that the first few values of 8n-1 can all only be expressed as a minimum of the sum of four squares. Is this true for all values of n? What's the proof behind it? Thanks.

The possible values of squares modulo 8 are 0, 1 and 4. There's only one way to make 7 from 0, 1 and 4 using a maximum of 4 numbers.
 
By what i said i mean

7 = 2^2 + 1^2 + 1^2 + 1^2
15 = 3^2 + 2^2 + 1^2 + 1^2
23 = 3^2 + 3^2 + 2^2 + 1^2
31 = 3^2 + 3^2 + 3^2 + 2^2
etc.

i.e. The first few values of 8n-1 (The first 10 at least) can't be shown as a sum of less than four squares.

Not sure what you mean by modulo 8 and what-not, sorry. You might have to dumb it down a bit for me. What exactly are you trying to say?
 
willem2 said:
The possible values of squares modulo 8 are 0, 1 and 4. There's only one way to make 7 from 0, 1 and 4 using a maximum of 4 numbers.

Sorry, meant to quote you in previous post.
 
Think about clock work math. If it's 11 a.m. and add two more hours we get 1 p.m. You can view this as 11 mod 12 + 2 mod 12 = 1 mod 12. So what he's saying is that the values in mod 8 that are squared can only be 0, 1, and 4. So now if you consider 7 mod 8, you can only get that by adding 1 + 1 + 1 + 4. If you're not familiar with this method:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modula...3osI9mtGGTpQGAAAABAEAADqRgAAgHAAAAAAAALgaAAA=
 
MarneMath said:
Think about clock work math. If it's 11 a.m. and add two more hours we get 1 p.m. You can view this as 11 mod 12 + 2 mod 12 = 1 mod 12. So what he's saying is that the values in mod 8 that are squared can only be 0, 1, and 4. So now if you consider 7 mod 8, you can only get that by adding 1 + 1 + 1 + 4. If you're not familiar with this method:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modula...3osI9mtGGTpQGAAAABAEAADqRgAAgHAAAAAAAALgaAAA=

Ah, I remember now. This came up on a maths test I once did. Completely forgot about it though. Thanks for the help.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top