Lagrangian/Hamiltonian of a charged particle

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the possibility of formulating a non-relativistic Lagrangian for a charged particle that accounts for its own electromagnetic field, as described by Lienard-Wiechert potentials. Participants explore the challenges of radiation reaction and the complexities of self-consistent dynamical equations in both non-relativistic and relativistic frameworks.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether a non-relativistic Lagrangian can be constructed that yields the correct equations of motion for a charged particle influenced by its own field.
  • Another participant highlights the complexity of achieving self-consistent dynamical equations for point particles, referencing the radiation reaction problem and the limitations of existing equations like the Landau-Lifshitz equation.
  • There is a query about the existence of a relativistic Lagrangian that can describe the interaction between a charged particle and the electromagnetic field.
  • Participants reference specific papers that discuss models of charged bodies and their dynamics, suggesting that a fully consistent treatment requires a relativistic approach.
  • One participant expresses interest in the referenced papers for further understanding of the issues surrounding point particles and their treatment in electrodynamics.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the complexity of the problem and the necessity of a relativistic framework, but there is no consensus on the existence of a satisfactory Lagrangian or the best approach to the issue.

Contextual Notes

The discussion touches on unresolved issues related to radiation reaction, the limitations of existing models, and the challenges of formulating a self-consistent theory for charged particles interacting with their own fields.

dRic2
Gold Member
Messages
887
Reaction score
225
I know that a moving particle is subjected to its own field according to Lienard-Wiechert potentials. But is it possible to write a non-relativistic Lagrangian which, upon variation of the action, give rise to the "correct" equation of motion? If such a Lagrangian/Hamiltonian exists, then is it possible to quantize it and use it in the Schrödinger equation?

This is just a curiosity, I'm not looking for some rigorous explanations. I tried googling "Lienard-Wiechert Lagragian", but I couldn't understand most of the results. "Lagrangian of a charged particle" was an other try, but all the articles I've found talked about an external field, which is not what I was looking for.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is a very complicated issue, and for point particles it's not possible to give an exact system of self-consistent dynamical equations of the electromagnetic field and a point particle. It's the notorious problem of radiation reaction. The best approximation known today is the Landau-Lifshitz equation, which is an approximation of the Abraham-Lorentz-Dirac equation which has serious problems (self-acceleration, acausal solutions).

The problem is solved within continuum mechanics. A somewhat artificial but very nice model is the motion of a Born-rigid charged body:

https://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0508031
https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0702078

Note that a fully consistent dynamics of a closed system of charges and em. fields is necessarily relativistic!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dRic2
vanhees71 said:
Note that a fully consistent dynamics of a closed system of charges and em. fields is necessarily relativistic!
Is there a relativistic Lagrangian that can describe this process? I mean, the Lagrangian of EM field is know, the relativistic Lagrangian of the point particle is also know. What about the interaction part ? Is there a know way to explicitly write it in relativistic therms ?
 
See the 2nd paper quoted in #2. As I said for a point particle there are notorious problems which cannot be solved since ~1910!
 
Do you mean Medina R 2006 Am. J. Phys. 74 1031–1034 ?
 
No I mean what I quoted above:

R. Medina, Lagrangian of the quasi-rigid charge
https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0702078

To understand the problem better, I recommend the other paper by Medina, which gives also a review on the problems with point particles:

R. Medina, Lagrangian of the quasi-rigid extended charge
https://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0508031

Of course there's also a chapter about it in Jackson's textbook on electrodynamics.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dRic2
Ah ok I though they were exclusively on rigid particles. I will have lot for sure. Thanks for the material.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
956
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
5K