Lagrangian in rotating space without potential

ShamelessGit
Messages
38
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I want to derive the centrifugal and Coriolis forces with the Lagrangian for rotating space. The speed of an object for an outside observer is dr/dt + w x r, where r are the moving coordinates. So m/2(dr/dt + w x r)^2 is the Lagrangian.


The Attempt at a Solution



Everything above makes intuitive sense to me. The problem is that I don't know how to use the chain rule on the w x r.

When I derive it by dr/dt and then by d/dt I get m(d^2r/dt^2 + w x dr/dt), which is what I'm supposed to get.

But when I do it by d/dr I just cannot get what I'm supposed to. I looked all over the internet and I can't find the chain rule for cross products and I've played with it for a long time and it just doesn't work.

Please help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
<br /> <br /> \frac{\partial}{\partial t} (A \times B) = \frac{\partial A}{\partial t} \times B + A \times\frac{\partial B}{\partial t}<br /> <br />

Then just apply the chain rule as you normally would for each derivative term, i.e.
<br /> \frac{\partial A}{\partial t} = \frac{\partial A}{\partial r}\frac{\partial r}{\partial t}<br />

edit - I realize this might not answer your question, but I'm having a hard time following what you're asking. What do you mean by 'derive it by dr/dt'
 
I mean derive it by r dot, the time derivative of of r.

When I derive it by r I get m(dr/dt + w x r)(d/dr(w x r)) and I don't know what to do with that. It seems reasonable to think that it is equal to m(dr/dt + w x r)(w x 1), but what do I do now? When you use the chain rule like this is it multiplied by a dot product? A cross product?
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top