Langrangian in non-inertial frames?

  • Thread starter Thread starter HomogenousCow
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Frames
AI Thread Summary
In non-inertial frames, the Lagrangian formulation can still be applied, but it requires the introduction of pseudo forces to account for the acceleration of the reference frame. The standard rules of Lagrangian mechanics are modified to include these additional forces, which help in transitioning to an inertial frame. Understanding the treatment of these pseudo forces is crucial for accurate calculations in non-inertial systems. The linked document provides further insights into this topic. Properly applying these concepts allows for effective analysis of dynamics in non-inertial frames.
HomogenousCow
Messages
736
Reaction score
213
I'm not entirely sure how to treat non inertial frames in the lagrangian formulation, do the normal rules still apply?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thanks, this might clear some things up
 

Thread 'Average velocity as a weighted mean'

Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
View full post »

Thread '1:1 versus 2:1 Mechanical Advantage debate'

The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
View full post »
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'

Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'

Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
View full post »

Similar threads

B Inertial vs non inertial frames
Replies
3
Views
2K
Whether a non-inertial frame is absolute
2
Replies
94
Views
6K
I Reference frames in terms of homogenity/isotropy
Replies
18
Views
2K
I Using reference frames for derivation of Lagrangian
Replies
25
Views
2K
I Is there a way in Lagrangian mechanics to incorporate the inertial response from initial momentum when using initial conditions instead of BCs?
Replies
9
Views
939
What is an inertial frame? A conflict of two definitions
2
Replies
83
Views
5K
I Relative Motion & Local Frame’s Position - when projecting components
Replies
6
Views
2K
What are non-inertial frames of reference?
Replies
15
Views
3K
Which inertial frame is used when resolving toward the centre
Replies
15
Views
1K
I Velocity transformation between frames rotating relative to one another
Replies
1
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top