Laplace transform of exp (-t^2)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving the ordinary differential equation (ODE) y" + y - exp(-t^2) = 0 with initial conditions y(0) = y'(0) = 0. Participants are particularly focused on finding the Laplace transform of the term exp(-t^2).

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore various methods for finding the Laplace transform of exp(-t^2), including transformations and properties of the Laplace transform. Questions arise regarding the simplicity of the Laplace transform for this function, with some expressing skepticism about its straightforwardness due to the nature of the integral involved.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants sharing different insights and approaches. Some have referenced results obtained through software, while others suggest traditional methods like integration by parts. There is a recognition of the complexity of the integral related to exp(-t^2) and the potential for misunderstanding in the original problem setup.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the integral related to exp(-t^2) is associated with the error function, and there is speculation about possible misinterpretations of the problem statement. The discussion reflects a mix of attempts to clarify the mathematical properties involved and the challenges posed by the problem.

angelas
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,
I need to solve this ODE using the laplace transform:
y" + y - exp (-t^2) = 0 , y(0) = y'(0) = 0

My question is on how to find the laplace transform of exp (-t^2).

I used different properties of laplace transform to solve it but I was not succesfull. I was thinking that I can find the laplace transform of exp (-t^2) by a simple transformation of u = -t^2 and then using the derivative property of laplace transform. But it didn't work.

I really appreciate any helps to solve this problem.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What reason do you have to think this has a simple Laplace transform? It will clearly involve and integration of e^(-t^2)dt and that has not simple anti-derivative.
 
Hi angelas,
I have to solve that too,
I know the answer but I have no idea how to solve. I have found the answer via Matlab.
the bilateral Laplace transform of exp (-t^2) is pi^1/2*exp(1/4*s^2) while u have no initial condition u can use bilateral Laplace.so u must just compute inverse Laplace transform of pi^1/2*exp(1/4*s^2)/(s^2+1).
if anybody know the way how that integral is computed leave the answer here.
Thanx
 
Have you tried integration by parts on deriving the result of L{exp(-t^2)} from first principles?
 
Hi angelas,
I have found the exact way to solve I hope it is not too late. ;)
While I am using a dial up connection it is a time consuming job to type the formulas so I tried attach the file to it but I don't know why it did not work. so if you want that just mail me. :)
hell_iut@yahoo.com
 
HoneyMoon said:
Hi angelas,
I have found the exact way to solve I hope it is not too late. ;)

hell_iut@yahoo.com

This integral is actually the error function. I remembered seeing it somewhere.
Read the following link which says that you don't have a closed form solution for this.

The professor must have meant (exp(t))^2 not exp(t^2). If you're taking a class solving ODEs, error functions won't really come up, unless the prof just wants to go overboard. That's why I think there is a mistake in the original post.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Error_function
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K