Large Mass But Low Kinetic Energy

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
8 replies · 4K views
PrakashPrasad
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
Can anyone please let me know an example where a body has large mass but low Kinetic Energy? Please provide some reasons for same.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What exactly do you need it for? Then I may be able to help you better.
 
SDewan said:
What exactly do you need it for? Then I may be able to help you better.
I am in need of an example of a body having large mass but low kinetic energy? Please let me some reason for same - is an elephant moving uphill an example of same
 
Going by the definition, KE=1/2*m*v^2
Just consider a fully loaded truck moving slowly in a traffic jam.
This meets the requirement for a heavy body and low KE. The only thing which is in our control is the velocity. So have as low a velocity as possible.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PrakashPrasad
PrakashPrasad said:
I am in need of an example of a body having large mass but low kinetic energy? Please let me some reason for same - is an elephant moving uphill an example of same
How about a sleeping elephant?
 
A.T. said:
How about a sleeping elephant?
This case, though meets thecriteria, but is an extreme case.
 
PrakashPrasad said:
Can anyone please let me know an example where a body has large mass but low Kinetic Energy? Please provide some reasons for same.
How about a tectonic plate. 40E21 kg at 1.6E-9 m/s gives a KE of about 50 kJ, which is only enough energy to power a typical incandescent light bulb for about 20 minutes.
 
Dale said:
How about a tectonic plate.
Or how about any massive object in the rest frame of that object?