Laser Incident to Surface Perpendicularly

  • Thread starter Thread starter yklin_tux
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Laser Surface
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the behavior of light when an ideal laser is shone perpendicularly onto a surface with a reflection coefficient of 0.7. It highlights that while some light is transmitted through the surface, the reflected light undergoes a 180-degree phase change, leading to the formation of a standing wave pattern. The mathematical representation of the electric field combines both traveling and standing wave components, illustrating that energy is both transmitted and stored in the standing wave. The conversation also touches on the possibility of observing interference patterns in a vacuum, confirming that such patterns can indeed occur. Overall, the participants seek to deepen their understanding of wave behavior at normal incidence and the implications of their mathematical representations.
yklin_tux
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hello I have a question regarding reflected light from a surface of higher index of refraction.

Suppose I have a ideal laser, and an ideal surface with reflection coefficient 0.7 or something like that.

Say I shine my laser directly perpendicular to the surface (at 90 degrees).

I understand some light will go through, but the reflected light will have a 180 degree phase change, and be traveling opposite to the incoming light.

This screams standing wave pattern, but I do not understand the physical interpretation of this.

I get how a standing wave can be formed in a mirror cavity, but in the present situation where I just have light reflecting from a surface, what happens? I know the equation for my electric field will look something like

E = sin(x - wt) + 0.7 sin(x + wt) assuming that k = 1, E0 = 1

And the result of this is a standing wave. In this case, some energy is transmitted into the surface, and the rest is stored in the standing wave?

I understand seeing the reflected light in this case is impossible because it would mean blocking the incoming light, so seeing reflected light is only possible when light is shined at an angle other than 90 degrees.

Actually, plotting the above function in ROOT and making it a histogram, and watching the projections of y (in watching what happens with the wave as time goes on). I see that the wave actually moves, but very slowly? While still modulating amplitude...

I just want to understand what happens in the case of normal incidence because I clearly have two waves traveling in opposite directions with same frequency.
 
Science news on Phys.org
Can we obtain an interference pattern in vacuum?

I want to know too..
 
yklin_tux said:
E = sin(x - wt) + 0.7 sin(x + wt) assuming that k = 1, E0 = 1
The result is a combination of a traveling wave + a standing wave. To see this, you can rewrite that equation as

E = 0.3sin(x-wt) + 0.7[sin(x - wt) + sin(x + wt)],​

which shows explicitly the traveling wave and standing wave components.

And the result of this is a standing wave. In this case, some energy is transmitted into the surface, and the rest is stored in the standing wave?
Some of the energy is in the wave (standing and traveling components), some is transmitted through the mirror.

Actually, plotting the above function in ROOT and making it a histogram, and watching the projections of y (in watching what happens with the wave as time goes on). I see that the wave actually moves, but very slowly? While still modulating amplitude...
I'm unable to imagine how to visualize the effect myself, but your simulation is probably correct. Perhaps you could try varying the reflectance of 0.7 ... try something really small (0.1?) and something closer to 100%, perhaps 0.9 or 0.95.

asdofindia said:
Can we obtain an interference pattern in vacuum?
Yes. Light travels in a vacuum, so that is no problem.
 
Last edited:
Redbelly98 said:
The result is a combination of a traveling wave + a standing wave. To see this, you can rewrite that equation as

E = 0.3sin(x-wt) + 0.7[sin(x - wt) + sin(x + wt)],​

which shows explicitly the traveling wave and standing wave components.

When you say a traveling and standing wave, what does that mean? That there is some standing wave pattern which is itself moving? I guess this is the part I do not get...
 
No, I mean there is a standing wave (which does not move to the left or right), as well as a traveling wave moving to the right. Can you identify which terms in my equation represent the traveling wave, and which represent the standing wave?

E = 0.3sin(x-wt) + 0.7[sin(x - wt) + sin(x + wt)]​

Mind you, I myself am not able to visualize this combined wave, I am just looking at the math terms in the equation.
 
E = 0.3sin(x-wt) + 0.7[sin(x - wt) + sin(x + wt)],
= 0.3 sin(x-wt) + 0.7[(sin x cos wt - sin wt cos x) + (sin x cos wt + sin wt cos x)]
= 0.3 sin(x-wt) + 0.7[(sin x cos wt )+ (sin x cos wt )]
= 0.3 sin(x-wt) + 0.7[2(sin x cos wt )]
= 0.3 sin(x-wt) + 1.4 (sin x) (cos wt)
= the traveling wave + the standing wave
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top