Lasers on earth visible from Mars

AI Thread Summary
Amateur astronomers have successfully used a blue-light laser to target the International Space Station (ISS), which astronauts were able to see. The discussion centers on the feasibility of using a laser visible from Mars, particularly when shone from the dark side of Earth. The human eye cannot resolve Earth from Mars due to the overwhelming sunlight, making visibility challenging. Calculations suggest that a 1mW laser pointer has a visibility range of about 4,000 km, requiring approximately 100 kW of power to be seen from Mars, assuming the beam is well-focused. The wavelength of the laser light also affects visibility; shorter wavelengths may enhance visibility but produce fewer photons per power unit. The conversation touches on the immense power needed for direct propulsion using lasers, estimating around 1 gigawatt to achieve significant thrust. Theoretical applications of lasers for propulsion, as depicted in science fiction, would require petawatt levels of power, highlighting the vast energy demands for such technologies.
andrewbee
Hi,

I read something interesting about some amateur astronomers lasing the ISS with a blue-light laser, and the astronauts were able to spot it.

How powerful would a laser have to be to be seen by the human eye from Mars? It would be shone from the dark side of Earth of course. Are we talking one (or several) guide star lasers from the big observatories? Metal-cutting beams (c. 50w)? Naval anti-missile experimental lasers (c. 100 kw)?

Any input appreciated.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The human eye cannot resolve the disk of Earth from Mars, so you always have much more sunlight than laser light.
Even if we neglect this and just take the minimal distance (~55 million km), it depends on the focus of the laser beam: If you use a telescope (in the "wrong" direction of light) to focus the beam, the power can be reduced significantly compared to a regular laser.

Edit: For a laser pointer of 1mW, I calculated 4000km as lower bound on the visibility range a while ago. 10000 times this distance would need 100 million times the power, or 100kW, assuming the focussing remains the same.
 
Last edited:
That's really helpful,thanks. Did you make any assumptions about whether it was red, green or blue light?
 
700nm -> red
A shorter wavelength could improve the visibility limit a bit, but it also gives a lower number of photons per power, and it is harder to create.
 
mfb said:
For a laser pointer of 1mW, I calculated 4000km as lower bound on the visibility range a while ago. 10000 times this distance would need 100 million times the power, or 100kW, assuming the focussing remains the same.

That's surprising.

One of my favorite novels is https://www.amazon.com/dp/0974776963/?tag=pfamazon01-20, in which they propel a spaceship to Earth by the power of a laser shined from Alpha Centauri. If it takes 100kW just to be able to see it on Mars, it must take petawatts to propel a ship to the nearest star.

https://www.amazon.com/dp/0671741926/?tag=pfamazon01-20 is another novel that did a similar thing.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Well, such a system would have a much better focus than a laser pointer. If you use something like the E-ELT (40m-mirror, currently under construction), a strong laser pointer could be sufficient to be visible from Mars. The laser spot would have a diameter of a few kilometers there.

Direct propulsion with light pressure requires insane amounts of power - about 1 gigawatt (or 1 big powerplant) per 6N (enough to hold a mass 600g on earth), even if the whole laser hits the spacecraft .
 
I wonder how much stories were written, that involve space fighters, and arent so soft as Star wars. I dont think missiles totally make fighter craft obsolate, for example the former cant escort shuttles if one wants to capture a celestial body. I dont insist fighters have to be manned (i enjoyed Enders game about someone control the events for afar) but i also think it isnt totally unjustifiable.
So far I've been enjoying the show but I am curious to hear from those a little more knowledgeable of the Dune universe as my knowledge is only of the first Dune book, The 1984 movie, The Sy-fy channel Dune and Children of Dune mini series and the most recent two movies. How much material is it pulling from the Dune books (both the original Frank Herbert and the Brian Herbert books)? If so, what books could fill in some knowledge gaps?
Back
Top