Launch Loop to Space: Questions & Answers

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the concept of a launch loop to space, with inquiries about its feasibility and technical requirements. Key questions include the necessary speed to reach Low Earth Orbit (LEO), the impact of atmospheric entry at sea level, and the potential sonic boom at high speeds. Participants acknowledge the speculative nature of the technology but agree that some questions, like launch velocity, are valid and worth exploring. Suggestions for design improvements include using pellets instead of a ribbon for better efficiency. Overall, the conversation highlights both curiosity and skepticism regarding the launch loop's practicality and implementation.
I3VI5
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello guys, this is my first post here so sorry if I put it in the wrong section.

I heard the idea of a launch loop to space and thought it was really cool so I wonder why they haven't build it yet.

Now since I'm no physics expert I need some clarifications on the physics in building it.

Before starting let's make the assumption that we can "easily" achieve the necessary speed to send it to LEO.

OK? So here are the questions:

1. If we build a launch loop on sea level, what is the speed it must achieve to get to LEO?

2. If it is propelled in a vacuum tube, then after reaching the needed speed (my guess is 10km/s), can it withstand the impact with air at sea level? If no, at what altitude will it be able to withstand it with the current technology?

3.What is the sonic boom at those speeds?

5. Where is the best place on Earth to build it? (I have 10bn$ ready to invest! :-D )

6. If you were to design one, and money was not an issue (I can provide more than 10 billion if you want! lol), what would it be like?

7. Why haven't they build it yet? I'm tired of going to Bora Bora for vacation, I need something new! lol

Before dismissing the idea or calling me names reflect a bit on it, it won't hurt anyone.

Thanks in advance for all your responses!
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Why do you assume, before anyone answers, that they are going to be dismissive?

It's a perfectly valid idea, but hopelessly speculative.

Now, have you got anything you want to say that's actually worth talking about?
 
AJ Bentley said:
Why do you assume, before anyone answers, that they are going to be dismissive?... Now, have you got anything you want to say that's actually worth talking about?

Uh, Do you realize how inconsistent this reply is?

Also, the tech is speculative, but some of his questions (launch velocity, etc.) are perfectly good. If I weren't at work right now :-p I'd do the math. I will when I get home, if no one else has by then.
 
Of course I do - that was the point of the joke.

As I said, it's hopelessly speculative - that's why I won't be bothering to think about it.
 
I3VI5 said:
2. If it is propelled in a vacuum tube, then after reaching the needed speed (my guess is 10km/s), can it withstand the impact with air at sea level?

Yeah, I don't think that would be a good idea.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top