Launching Spacecraft from the Moon: Is it Worth It?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mr8Manhattan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Moon
AI Thread Summary
Launching spacecraft from the Moon could be more efficient than from Earth due to reduced gravitational pull and the potential for a slingshot effect. However, spacecraft would still need to be sent from Earth to the Moon for assembly or launch, complicating logistics. The absence of an atmosphere on the Moon may enhance rocket efficiency by allowing exhaust to exit without resistance. Ultimately, the feasibility of lunar launches hinges on advancements in technology and in situ resource utilization. If sustainable operations for spacecraft production on the Moon are established, launching from there could prove significantly beneficial.
Mr8Manhattan
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Would launching spacecraft from the moon be more effective than from earth?

I'm thinking that it would take less energy to escape the gravitational pull, and the added revolution would allow for a more significant slingshot effect on the craft.

Granted the craft would either have to first be launched from Earth and land on the moon, or it would have to be assembled on the moon. Both would be quite difficult, but would it be worth it?

Also, would the absence of an atmosphere make things more difficult, with no outside fuel to interact with, or would it help, because there is "no" resistance?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Mr8Manhattan said:
Would launching spacecraft from the moon be more effective than from earth?

I'm thinking that it would take less energy to escape the gravitational pull, and the added revolution would allow for a more significant slingshot effect on the craft.

Granted the craft would either have to first be launched from Earth and land on the moon, or it would have to be assembled on the moon. Both would be quite difficult, but would it be worth it?

Also, would the absence of an atmosphere make things more difficult, with no outside fuel to interact with, or would it help, because there is "no" resistance?
It would definitely be more efficient. Just compare the size of the craft needed to get astronauts to the Moon;
e9ssg7.jpg


with the crafts that got them back

mtrwup.jpg

2e0o1g6.jpg


As for whether or not it would practically better that really depends on the proposed technology. Currently it would not because as you say anything that is launched to the Moon would have to be sent there from Earth. So it really depends on the sophistication and economics of in situ resource utilisation.
 
Mr8Manhattan said:
Also, would the absence of an atmosphere make things more difficult, with no outside fuel to interact with, or would it help, because there is "no" resistance?

For rockets it would be much better. A rocket engine performs best when the exhaust can exit at its maximum speed. This allows it to be more efficient as there is no air in the way of the exhaust.

If we had the capability to sustain an entire operation to produce and manufacture the spacecraft on the Moon it would be much better to launch from there.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This hypothesis of scientists about the origin of the mysterious signal WOW seems plausible only on a superficial examination. In fact, such a strong coherent radiation requires a powerful initiating factor, and the hydrogen atoms in the cloud themselves must be in an overexcited state in order to respond instantly. If the density of the initiating radiation is insufficient, then the atoms of the cloud will not receive it at once, some will receive it earlier, and some later. But then there...

Similar threads

Replies
98
Views
11K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
183
Views
18K
Replies
19
Views
3K
Back
Top