Laurent Series Expansion of \frac{1}{e^z - 1}

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves determining the Laurent series expansion of the function \(\frac{1}{e^z - 1}\). The original poster attempts to relate this function to \(\coth{\frac{z}{2}}\) but expresses uncertainty about the next steps and how to evaluate derivatives at the singularity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the need to specify the center of the Laurent series and explore the implications of singularities at \(z=0\). There are suggestions to use long division and equate coefficients, as well as to factor the denominator to facilitate series expansion. Questions arise regarding the evaluation of the function and its derivatives at the singularity.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with various approaches being suggested. Some participants provide guidance on methods to find the series, while others express confusion about the evaluation of the function at the singularity. There is no explicit consensus on a single method, but multiple lines of reasoning are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the function is singular at \(z=0\), which complicates the evaluation of derivatives. The original problem does not specify the center for the Laurent series, leading to further exploration of assumptions and methods.

FeDeX_LaTeX
Science Advisor
Messages
436
Reaction score
13
Homework Statement
Determine the Laurent series expansion of

[tex]\frac{1}{e^z - 1}[/tex]

The attempt at a solution

I've spotted that

[tex]\frac{1}{e^z - 1} = \frac{1}{2}\left( \coth{\frac{z}{2}} - 1\right)[/tex]

but I don't know what to do next. WolframAlpha gives the series centred at 0 as:

[tex]\frac{1}{z} -\frac{1}{2} + \frac{z}{12} - \frac{z^3}{720} + \frac{z^5}{30240} + ...[/tex]

but I don't know how they arrived at this. How are they evaluating f(0), f'(0), etc.? I'm getting an undefined answer for f(0) and f'(0) too.

I'm defining f(z) as

[tex]f(z) = \frac{1}{2}\left( \coth\frac{z}{2} - 1 \right)[/tex]

Any help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Did the question specify where to center the Laurent series?

At a point a, the Laurent series around a for your function is given by ##\displaystyle \sum_{n=-\infty}^{\infty}\left[\oint_{A}\frac{dz}{2\pi i(e^z-1)(z-a)^{n+1}}(z-a)^n\right]##, where A is a contour centered at a.
 
Mandelbroth said:
Did the question specify where to center the Laurent series?

At a point a, the Laurent series around a for your function is given by ##\displaystyle \sum_{n=-\infty}^{\infty}\left[\oint_{A}\frac{dz}{2\pi i(e^z-1)(z-a)^{n+1}}(z-a)^n\right]##, where A is a contour centered at a.

No, it didn't specify -- although the answer given gives the Laurent series centred at z = 0.

Where did you get that from?

I simplified that down to

##\displaystyle \frac{1}{2 \pi i}\sum_{n=-\infty}^{\infty}\left[\oint_{A}\frac{dz}{z(e^z-1)}\right]##

when a = 0. What do I do from here?
 
I think you need to do long division and equate coefficients. We know it has a simple pole at the origin so we can write:

[tex]\frac{1}{z+z^2/2+z^3/3!+\cdots}=\frac{d_0}{z}+d_1+d_2z+\cdots[/tex]

or:

[tex]-1+d_0+d_1z+d_2 z^2+\cdots+z d_0/2+\cdots+d_0/3! z^2+\cdots=0[/tex]

and so forth. Now equate coefficients.
 
jackmell said:
I think you need to do long division and equate coefficients. We know it has a simple pole at the origin so we can write:

[tex]\frac{1}{z+z^2/2+z^3/3!+\cdots}=\frac{d_0}{z}+d_1+d_2z+\cdots[/tex]

or:

[tex]-1+d_0+d_1z+d_2 z^2+\cdots+z d_0/2+\cdots+d_0/3! z^2+\cdots=0[/tex]

and so forth. Now equate coefficients.

Or factor the z out the denominator of your first expression getting it in the form ##\frac{1}{z(1+f(z))}## and use the taylor series expansion ##\frac{1}{1+f(z)}=1-f(z)+f(z)^2-f(z)^3...##. Only keep the powers of z up to the highest power you need.
 
FeDeX_LaTeX said:
How are they evaluating f(0), f'(0), etc.? I'm getting an undefined answer for f(0) and f'(0) too.
They're not evaluating f(0), f'(0), … because f(z) is singular at z=0. If the function didn't blow up at the origin, then the series for f(z) is just its Taylor series about ##z=0##, and you find it the usual way. But as you saw, you're running into problems because f(z) blows up at z=0. In cases like these, you need to find the Laurent series.

So the fact that this problem asked you to find the Laurent series suggests you're looking for where the function blows up, which in this case is z=0, so you want to expand the function about z=0.

Personally, I think Dick's suggestion is the most straightforward way to find the series. I prefer to avoid long division when possible.
 
FeDeX_LaTeX said:
I simplified that down to

##\displaystyle \frac{1}{2 \pi i}\sum_{n=-\infty}^{\infty}\left[\oint_{A}\frac{dz}{z(e^z-1)}\right]##

when a = 0. What do I do from here?
Mandelbroth meant
$$\sum_{n=-\infty}^{\infty}\left[\left(\oint_{A}\frac{dz}{2\pi i(e^z-1)(z-a)^{n+1}}\right)(z-a)^n\right].$$ You can't cancel the factors of (z-a).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K